Add some teams to prioritization exclude_labels #72385
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
spastorino
force-pushed
the
add-exclude-labels
branch
from
a8f28fa
to
93abdd7
Compare
|
@bors r+ rollup |
|
📌 Commit 93abdd7 has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
May 23, 2020
Rollup of 7 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#71289 (Allow using `Self::` in doc) - rust-lang#72375 (Improve E0599 explanation) - rust-lang#72385 (Add some teams to prioritization exclude_labels) - rust-lang#72395 (Allow rust-highfive to label issues it creates.) - rust-lang#72453 (Add flag to open docs: x.py doc --open) - rust-lang#72459 (Add core::future::IntoFuture) - rust-lang#72461 (Clean up E0600 explanation) Failed merges: r? @ghost
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
r? @Mark-Simulacrum @LeSeulArtichaut