Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

RISC-V GNU/Linux as host platform #72973

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 16, 2020
Merged

Conversation

msizanoen1
Copy link
Contributor

This PR add a new builder named dist-riscv64-linux that builds the compiler toolchain for RISC-V 64-bit GNU/Linux.

r? @alexcrichton

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jun 4, 2020
@msizanoen1
Copy link
Contributor Author

@rustbot modify labels: +O-riscv +O-linux +T-infra

@rustbot rustbot added O-linux Operating system: Linux O-riscv Target: RISC-V architecture T-infra Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Jun 4, 2020
@msizanoen1
Copy link
Contributor Author

@tblah

@tblah
Copy link
Contributor

tblah commented Jun 4, 2020

Looks good to me, thanks!

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

Code-wise this looks ok, but I'll leave it up to @pietroalbini for the final approval to confirm the infra team has capacity for this.

r? @pietroalbini

@pietroalbini
Copy link
Member

This adds RISC-V as a Tier 2 platform, has the compiler team approved the change?

@msizanoen1
Copy link
Contributor Author

It is already a tier 2 platform.

@msizanoen1
Copy link
Contributor Author

rust-lang/rust-forge#356

@pietroalbini
Copy link
Member

It is already a tier 2 platform.

Well, it's a tier 2 cross-compilation platform, but this PR moves it to a tier 2 host platform, which increases the amount of things we test on CI.

@nikomatsakis does the compiler team want to weight on moving RISC-V Linux to a tier 2 host platform (it's just a tier 2 cross-compilation platform now)?

@kinnison
Copy link
Contributor

kinnison commented Jun 8, 2020

For reference, rustup is ready to provide a binary on this target thanks to the work of @tblah

@nikomatsakis
Copy link
Contributor

I'm comfortable with adding new tier platforms if the infra support is there and if we setup a group of folks to notify for help when problems arise. I've been a bit slow in doing the work to create that group for windows, but I think we could readily create a group for RISC-V at the same time.

@nikomatsakis
Copy link
Contributor

(I didn't mean that to be the "opinion of the @rust-lang/compiler team", though. We don't really have a clear set of rules for what it takes to move something from Tier to Tier. I have to review what we said in our design meeting to remember how we felt about this.)

@nikomatsakis
Copy link
Contributor

So you may have seen the recent announcement of our Windows and ARM notification groups -- I'd like to setup something similar for RISC-V, but otherwise I am happy to accept the group as Tier 2.

I don't think we've quite worked out what are the requirements to "move forward" around Tiers and the like. The draft RFC states that "Any new tier 2 target requires compiler team approval based on these requirements", but it's not very clear on what "compiler team approval" means.

I think something like an MCP would be a reasonable way to advertise this change. I would happily second such a proposal, presuming that Infra gives the ok and that we can find >=2 volunteers to be on the "notification list" for RISC-V.

@pietroalbini
Copy link
Member

By the way, we need to discuss a bit inside the infrastructure team on whether we have the capacity to add extra builders or not.

@chaozju
Copy link

chaozju commented Jun 13, 2020

@msizanoen1
Hi !

Is there a beta way to boot riscv host rust?

I tried on your branch for native compiling in qemu but in some ways still failed

@pietroalbini
Copy link
Member

In today's infrastructure team meeting we approved allocating one builder for riscv64-unknown-linux-gnu. I'll defer to the compiler team for a final approval of the uplift to Host Tier 2.

@Elinvynia Elinvynia removed the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jul 2, 2020
@nikomatsakis
Copy link
Contributor

nikomatsakis commented Jul 9, 2020

@pietroalbini rust-lang/compiler-team#312 has been approved, so compiler team signs off on this

@pietroalbini
Copy link
Member

Thanks!

@bors r+ rollup=iffy

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 15, 2020

📌 Commit 933ba82 has been approved by pietroalbini

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-team Status: Awaiting decision from the relevant subteam (see the T-<team> label). labels Jul 15, 2020
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jul 16, 2020
…arth

Rollup of 14 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#72973 (RISC-V GNU/Linux as host platform)
 - rust-lang#73918 (Clean up E0715 explanation)
 - rust-lang#73959 (Clean up E0716 explanation)
 - rust-lang#74119 (Remove `Compiler::compile()`.)
 - rust-lang#74196 (Add option to collapse automatically implementors)
 - rust-lang#74218 (Add margin after doc search results)
 - rust-lang#74276 (improve DiscriminantKind handling)
 - rust-lang#74291 (Added docs for `From<c_int>` for `ExitStatus`)
 - rust-lang#74294 (Update cross-compilation README)
 - rust-lang#74337 (Handle case of incomplete local ty more gracefully)
 - rust-lang#74344 (Remove string comparison and use diagnostic item instead)
 - rust-lang#74347 (Initialize default providers only once)
 - rust-lang#74353 (Edit docs for rustc_middle::dep_graph::dep_node)
 - rust-lang#74374 (Add a 1.45 release note on lto vs. embed-bitcode)

Failed merges:

 - rust-lang#74251 (Teach bootstrap about target files vs target triples)

r? @ghost
@bors bors merged commit af3d4cb into rust-lang:master Jul 16, 2020
@msizanoen1 msizanoen1 deleted the riscv-host branch July 16, 2020 06:31
Manishearth added a commit to Manishearth/rust that referenced this pull request Jul 16, 2020
… r=pietroalbini

Add RISC-V GNU/Linux to src/tools/build-manifest as a host platform

Missed during rust-lang#72973
Manishearth added a commit to Manishearth/rust that referenced this pull request Jul 16, 2020
… r=pietroalbini

Add RISC-V GNU/Linux to src/tools/build-manifest as a host platform

Missed during rust-lang#72973
tblah added a commit to tblah/rustup that referenced this pull request Jul 16, 2020
tblah added a commit to tblah/rustup that referenced this pull request Jul 16, 2020
Manishearth added a commit to Manishearth/rust that referenced this pull request Jul 16, 2020
… r=pietroalbini

Add RISC-V GNU/Linux to src/tools/build-manifest as a host platform

Missed during rust-lang#72973
Manishearth added a commit to Manishearth/rust that referenced this pull request Jul 16, 2020
… r=pietroalbini

Add RISC-V GNU/Linux to src/tools/build-manifest as a host platform

Missed during rust-lang#72973
Manishearth added a commit to Manishearth/rust that referenced this pull request Jul 16, 2020
… r=pietroalbini

Add RISC-V GNU/Linux to src/tools/build-manifest as a host platform

Missed during rust-lang#72973
Manishearth added a commit to Manishearth/rust that referenced this pull request Jul 17, 2020
… r=pietroalbini

Add RISC-V GNU/Linux to src/tools/build-manifest as a host platform

Missed during rust-lang#72973
Manishearth added a commit to Manishearth/rust that referenced this pull request Jul 17, 2020
… r=pietroalbini

Add RISC-V GNU/Linux to src/tools/build-manifest as a host platform

Missed during rust-lang#72973
workingjubilee pushed a commit to workingjubilee/rustup that referenced this pull request Aug 10, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
O-linux Operating system: Linux O-riscv Target: RISC-V architecture S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-infra Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet