Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add tests that check Vec::retain predicate execution order. #99386

Merged

Conversation

AngelicosPhosphoros
Copy link
Contributor

@AngelicosPhosphoros AngelicosPhosphoros commented Jul 17, 2022

This behaviour is documented for Vec::retain which means that there is code that rely on that but there weren't tests about that.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @kennytm

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jul 17, 2022

Hey! It looks like you've submitted a new PR for the library teams!

If this PR contains changes to any rust-lang/rust public library APIs then please comment with @rustbot label +T-libs-api -T-libs to tag it appropriately. If this PR contains changes to any unstable APIs please edit the PR description to add a link to the relevant API Change Proposal or create one if you haven't already. If you're unsure where your change falls no worries, just leave it as is and the reviewer will take a look and make a decision to forward on if necessary.

Examples of T-libs-api changes:

  • Stabilizing library features
  • Introducing insta-stable changes such as new implementations of existing stable traits on existing stable types
  • Introducing new or changing existing unstable library APIs (excluding permanently unstable features / features without a tracking issue)
  • Changing public documentation in ways that create new stability guarantees
  • Changing observable runtime behavior of library APIs

@rustbot rustbot added the T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Jul 17, 2022
@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jul 17, 2022
@JohnCSimon JohnCSimon added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Aug 13, 2022
@JohnTitor
Copy link
Member

r? @JohnTitor

@rust-highfive rust-highfive assigned JohnTitor and unassigned kennytm Aug 19, 2022
@JohnTitor
Copy link
Member

Thanks! @bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Aug 21, 2022

📌 Commit 85a9c74 has been approved by JohnTitor

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Aug 21, 2022
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Aug 22, 2022
Rollup of 5 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#93162 (Std module docs improvements)
 - rust-lang#99386 (Add tests that check `Vec::retain` predicate execution order.)
 - rust-lang#99915 (Recover keywords in trait bounds)
 - rust-lang#100694 (Migrate rustc_ast_passes diagnostics to `SessionDiagnostic` and translatable messages (first part))
 - rust-lang#100757 (Catch overflow early)

Failed merges:

 - rust-lang#99917 (Move Error trait into core)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 33b5ce6 into rust-lang:master Aug 22, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.65.0 milestone Aug 22, 2022
@AngelicosPhosphoros AngelicosPhosphoros deleted the add_retain_test_maybeuninit branch August 22, 2022 15:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

7 participants