-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 888
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
rustup 1.25: On Windows, nested cargo invocation with a toolchain specified fails #3036
Comments
@nicholasbishop can you change your program to print |
Sure thing. What's the recommended way to install an older version of rustup? |
Hmm, I'm not sure we keep around older versions - you may need to build from source: https://github.com/rust-lang/rustup/releases/tag/1.24.3 |
@nicholasbishop you can download the installer from either URLs, depending on the extension of the OS:
So, for example: |
Thanks. Here's what it looks like in 1.24.3: $ cargo run
Finished dev [unoptimized + debuginfo] target(s) in 0.01s
Running `target\debug\rustup-nested-bug-repro.exe`
RUSTUP_TOOLCHAIN: "stable-x86_64-pc-windows-msvc"
Original PATH: "C:\\Users\\nicholasbishop\\src\\rustup-nested-bug-repro\\target\\debug\\deps;C:\\Users\\nicholasbishop\\src\\rustup-nested-bug-repro\\target\\debug;C:\\Users\\nicholasbishop\\.rustup\\toolchains\\stable-x86_64-pc-windows-msvc\\lib\\rustlib\\x86_64-pc-windows-msvc\\lib;C:\\Users\\nicholasbishop\\.cargo\\bin;C:\\Users\\nicholasbishop\\.rustup\\toolchains\\stable-x86_64-pc-windows-msvc\\bin;C:\\Users\\nicholasbishop\\AppData\\Local\\Programs\\Python\\Python310\\;C:\\Users\\nicholasbishop\\bin;C:\\Program Files\\Git\\mingw64\\bin;C:\\Program Files\\Git\\usr\\local\\bin;C:\\Program Files\\Git\\usr\\bin;C:\\Program Files\\Git\\usr\\bin;C:\\Program Files\\Git\\mingw64\\bin;C:\\Program Files\\Git\\usr\\bin;C:\\Users\\nicholasbishop\\bin;C:\\Program Files\\Oculus\\Support\\oculus-runtime;C:\\Program Files (x86)\\Razer Chroma SDK\\bin;C:\\Program Files\\Razer Chroma SDK\\bin;C:\\Windows\\system32;C:\\Windows;C:\\Windows\\System32\\Wbem;C:\\Windows\\System32\\WindowsPowerShell\\v1.0;C:\\WINDOWS\\system32;C:\\WINDOWS;C:\\WINDOWS\\System32\\Wbem;C:\\WINDOWS\\System32\\WindowsPowerShell\\v1.0;C:\\WINDOWS\\System32\\OpenSSH;C:\\Program Files\\Git\\cmd;C:\\Users\\nicholasbishop\\.cargo\\bin;C:\\Users\\nicholasbishop\\AppData\\Local\\Microsoft\\WindowsApps;C:\\Program Files\\Git\\usr\\bin\\vendor_perl;C:\\Program Files\\Git\\usr\\bin\\core_perl"
running command: "cargo" "+nightly" "version"
cargo 1.64.0-nightly (b1dd22e66 2022-07-09) And in 1.25.0: $ cargo run
Finished dev [unoptimized + debuginfo] target(s) in 0.17s
Running `target\debug\rustup-nested-bug-repro.exe`
RUSTUP_TOOLCHAIN: "stable-x86_64-pc-windows-msvc"
Original PATH: "C:\\Users\\nicholasbishop\\src\\rustup-nested-bug-repro\\target\\debug\\deps;C:\\Users\\nicholasbishop\\src\\rustup-nested-bug-repro\\target\\debug;C:\\Users\\nicholasbishop\\.rustup\\toolchains\\stable-x86_64-pc-windows-msvc\\lib\\rustlib\\x86_64-pc-windows-msvc\\lib;C:\\Users\\nicholasbishop\\.rustup\\toolchains\\stable-x86_64-pc-windows-msvc\\bin;C:\\Users\\nicholasbishop\\AppData\\Local\\Programs\\Python\\Python310\\;C:\\Users\\nicholasbishop\\bin;C:\\Program Files\\Git\\mingw64\\bin;C:\\Program Files\\Git\\usr\\local\\bin;C:\\Program Files\\Git\\usr\\bin;C:\\Program Files\\Git\\usr\\bin;C:\\Program Files\\Git\\mingw64\\bin;C:\\Program Files\\Git\\usr\\bin;C:\\Users\\nicholasbishop\\bin;C:\\Program Files\\Oculus\\Support\\oculus-runtime;C:\\Program Files (x86)\\Razer Chroma SDK\\bin;C:\\Program Files\\Razer Chroma SDK\\bin;C:\\Windows\\system32;C:\\Windows;C:\\Windows\\System32\\Wbem;C:\\Windows\\System32\\WindowsPowerShell\\v1.0;C:\\WINDOWS\\system32;C:\\WINDOWS;C:\\WINDOWS\\System32\\Wbem;C:\\WINDOWS\\System32\\WindowsPowerShell\\v1.0;C:\\WINDOWS\\System32\\OpenSSH;C:\\Program Files\\Git\\cmd;C:\\Users\\nicholasbishop\\.cargo\\bin;C:\\Users\\nicholasbishop\\AppData\\Local\\Microsoft\\WindowsApps;C:\\Program Files\\Git\\usr\\bin\\vendor_perl;C:\\Program Files\\Git\\usr\\bin\\core_perl"
running command: "cargo" "+nightly" "version"
error: no such subcommand: `+nightly`
thread 'main' panicked at 'assertion failed: s.success()', src\main.rs:32:5
note: run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` environment variable to display a backtrace
error: process didn't exit successfully: `target\debug\rustup-nested-bug-repro.exe` (exit code: 101) Seems like the significant change between them might be the order of the entries. |
For future visitors: |
Fixes xtask build script for UWP/hololens2 builds, caused by changes in rustup 1.25 rust-lang/rustup#3036
Fixes xtask build script for UWP/hololens2 builds, caused by changes in rustup 1.25 rust-lang/rustup#3036
Run stable `fmt` & `cargo` through `rustup` `cargo test -p ide-assists` fails on Windows/x64/nightly: ```shell > rustup self update info: checking for self-updates rustup unchanged - 1.25.1 > rustup update info: syncing channel updates for 'stable-x86_64-pc-windows-msvc' info: syncing channel updates for 'nightly-x86_64-pc-windows-msvc' info: checking for self-updates stable-x86_64-pc-windows-msvc unchanged - rustc 1.62.1 (e092d0b6b 2022-07-16) nightly-x86_64-pc-windows-msvc unchanged - rustc 1.64.0-nightly (affe0d3a0 2022-08-05) info: cleaning up downloads & tmp directories > rustup show Default host: x86_64-pc-windows-msvc rustup home: C:\Users\stanc\.rustup installed toolchains -------------------- stable-x86_64-pc-windows-msvc nightly-x86_64-pc-windows-msvc (default) active toolchain ---------------- nightly-x86_64-pc-windows-msvc (default) rustc 1.64.0-nightly (affe0d3a0 2022-08-05) > cargo test -p ide-assists test tests::sourcegen::sourcegen_assists_docs ... FAILED failures: ---- tests::sourcegen::sourcegen_assists_docs stdout ---- thread 'tests::sourcegen::sourcegen_assists_docs' panicked at 'Failed to run rustfmt from toolchain 'stable'. Please run `rustup component add rustfmt --toolchain stable` to install it.', crates\sourcegen\src\lib.rs:141:9 note: run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` environment variable to display a backtrace failures: tests::sourcegen::sourcegen_assists_docs test result: FAILED. 1576 passed; 1 failed; 0 ignored; 0 measured; 0 filtered out; finished in 1.82s error: test failed, to rerun pass '-p ide-assists --lib' ``` After some investigation it seemed that [`cmd!`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/blob/51705698bd66919435e4fcbc25d96bd7fc5583f4/crates/sourcegen/src/lib.rs#L139) didn't execute the expected (stable) rustfmt. A simple `xshell` test failed too: ```rust use xshell::{cmd, Shell}; fn main() { let sh = &Shell::new().unwrap(); sh.set_var("RUSTUP_TOOLCHAIN", "stable"); let version = cmd!(sh, "rustfmt --version").read().unwrap_or_default(); println!("{version}"); } ``` Bypassing `xshell` and using `Command` directly failed too: ```rust use std::process::{Command, Stdio}; fn main() { let child = Command::new("rustfmt") .arg("--version") .stdin(Stdio::null()) .stdout(Stdio::piped()) .env("RUSTUP_TOOLCHAIN", "stable") .spawn() .expect("failed to start"); let output = child.wait_with_output().unwrap(); let version = String::from_utf8_lossy(&output.stdout); println!("{version}"); } ``` Spawning `cargo +stable fmt version` [failed too](rust-lang/rustup#3036) with `error: no such subcommand: +stable`. Only `rustup run stable` worked fine for both `cargo` and `fmt`. Thanks to `@lnicola` for a live investigation session, hints and tips.
Is this resolved in 1.25.1 or do we need to still find out what the right fix is? |
Still a problem according to rust-lang/rust-analyzer#12953. |
This was entirely an intentional change. It's not clear that Rustup should change In my mind, the bug here is that |
This works around rust-lang/rustup#3036 but also makes it so it can work without rustup.
This works around rust-lang/rustup#3036
I did some digging and opened #3178 as a solution for this issue. |
Optimize usage under rustup. Closes #10986 This optimizes cargo when running under rustup to circumvent the rustup proxies. The rustup proxies introduce overhead that can make a noticeable difference. The solution here is to identify if cargo would normally run `rustc` from PATH, and the current `rustc` in PATH points to something that looks like a rustup proxy (by comparing it to the `rustup` binary which is a hard-link to the proxy). If it detects this situation, then it looks for a binary in `$RUSTUP_HOME/toolchains/$TOOLCHAIN/bin/$TOOL`. If it finds the direct toolchain executable, then it uses that instead. ## Considerations There have been some past attempts in the past to address this, but it has been a tricky problem to solve. This change has some risk because cargo is attempting to guess what the user and rustup wants, and it may guess wrong. Here are some considerations and risks for this: * Setting `RUSTC` (as in rust-lang/rustup#2958) isn't an option. This makes the `RUSTC` setting "sticky" through invocations of different toolchains, such as a cargo subcommand or build script which does something like `cargo +nightly build`. * Changing `PATH` isn't an option, due to issues like rust-lang/rustup#3036 where cargo subcommands would be unable to execute proxies (so things like `+toolchain` shorthands don't work). * Setting other environment variables in rustup (as in rust-lang/rustup#3207 which adds `RUSTUP_TOOLCHAIN_DIR` the path to the toolchain dir) comes with various complications, as there is risk that the environment variables could get out of sync with one another (like with `RUSTUP_TOOLCHAIN`), causing tools to break or become confused. There was some consideration in that PR for adding protections by using an encoded environment variable that could be cross-checked, but I have concerns about the complexity of the solution. We may want to go with this solution in the long run, but I would like to try a short term solution in this PR first to see how it turns out. * This won't work for a `rustup-toolchain.toml` override with a [`path`](https://rust-lang.github.io/rustup/overrides.html#path) setting. Cargo will use the slow path in that case. In theory it could try to detect this situation, which may be an exercise for the future. * Some build-scripts, proc-macros, or custom cargo subcommands may be doing unusual things that interfere with the assumptions made in this PR. For example, a custom subcommand could call a `cargo` executable that is not managed by rustup. Proc-macros may be executing cargo or rustc, assuming it will reach some particular toolchain. It can be difficult to predict what unusual ways cargo and rustc are being used. This PR (and its tests) tries to make extra sure that it is resilient even in unusual circumstances. * The "dev" fallback in rustup can introduce some complications for some solutions to this problem. If a rustup toolchain does not have cargo, such as with a developer "toolchain link", then rustup will automatically call either the nightly, beta, or stable cargo if they are available. This PR should work correctly, since rustup sets the correct `RUSTUP_TOOLCHAIN` environment variable for the *actual* toolchain, not the one where cargo was executed from. * Special care should be considered for dynamic linking. `LD_LIBRARY_PATH` (linux), `DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH` (macos), and `PATH` (windows) need to be carefully set so that `rustc` can find its shared libraries. Directly executing `rustc` has some risk that it will load the wrong shared libraries. There are some mitigations for this. macOS and Linux use rpath, and Windows looks in the same directory as `rustc.exe`. Also, rustup configures the dyld environment variables from the outer cargo. Finally, cargo also configures these (particularly for the deprecated compiler plugins). * This shouldn't impact installations that don't use rustup. * I've done a variety of testing on the big three platforms, but certainly nowhere exhaustive. * One of many examples is making sure Clippy's development environment works correctly, which has special requirements for dynamic linking. * There is risk about future rustup versions changing some assumptions made here. Some assumptions: * It assumes that if `RUSTUP_TOOLCHAIN` is set, then the proxy *always* runs exactly that toolchain and no other. If this changes, cargo could execute the wrong version. Currently `RUSTUP_TOOLCHAIN` is the highest priority [toolchain override](https://rust-lang.github.io/rustup/overrides.html) and is fundamental to how toolchain selection becomes "sticky", so I think it is unlikely to change. * It assumes rustup sets `RUSTUP_TOOLCHAIN` to a value that is exactly equal to the name of the toolchain in the `toolchains` directory. This works for user shorthands like `RUSTUP_TOOLCHAIN=nightly`, which gets converted to the full toolchain name. However, it does not work for `path` overrides (see above). * It assumes the `toolchains` directory layout is always `$RUSTUP_HOME/toolchains/$TOOLCHAIN`. If this changes, then I think the only consequence is that cargo will go back to the slow path. * It assumes downloading toolchains is not needed (since cargo running from the toolchain means it should already be downloaded). * It assumes there is no other environment setup needed (such as the dyld paths mentioned above). My hope is that if assumptions are no longer valid that the worst case is that cargo falls back to the slow path of running the proxy from PATH. ## Performance This change won't affect the performance on Windows because rustup currently alters PATH to point to the toolchain directory. However, rust-lang/rustup#3178 is attempting to remove that, so this PR will be required to avoid a performance penalty on Windows. That change is currently opt-in, and will likely take a long while to roll out since it won't be released until after the next release, and may be difficult to get sufficient testing. I have done some rough performance testing on macOS, Windows, and Linux on a variety of different kinds of projects with different commands. The following attempts to summarize what I saw. The timings are going to be heavily dependent on the system and the project. These are the values I get on my systems, but will likely be very different for everyone else. The Windows tests were performed with a custom build of rustup with rust-lang/rustup#3178 applied and enabled (stock rustup shows no change in performance as explained above). The data is summarized in this spreadsheet: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1zSvU1fQ0uSELxv3VqWmegGBhbLR-8_KUkyIzCIk21X0/edit?usp=sharing `hello-world` has a particularly large impact of about 1.68 to 2.7x faster. However, a large portion of this overhead is related to running `rustc` at the start to discover its version and querying it for information. This is cached after the first run, so except for first-time builds, the effect isn't as noticeable. The "check with info" row is an benchmark that removes `target/debug/deps` but keeps the `.rustc_info.json` file. Incremental builds are a bit more difficult to construct since it requires customizing the commands for each project. I only did an incremental test for cargo itself, running `touch src/cargo/lib.rs` and then `cargo check --lib`. These measurements excluded the initial overhead of launching the rustup proxy to launch the initial cargo process. This was done just for simplicity, but it makes the test a little less characteristic of a typical usage, which will have some constant overhead for running the proxy. These tests were done using [`hyperfine`](https://crates.io/crates/hyperfine) version 1.16.1. The macOS system was an M2 Max (12-thread). The Windows and Linux experiments were run on a AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X (32-thread). Rust 1.68.2 was used for testing. I can share the commands if people want to see them.
@rbtcollins Can you reopen this since the change is still opt-in? |
Fixes xtask build script for UWP/hololens2 builds, caused by changes in rustup 1.25 rust-lang/rustup#3036
Fixes xtask build script for UWP/hololens2 builds, caused by changes in rustup 1.25 rust-lang/rustup#3036
On Windows, nested Cargo invocations fail if a toolchain is specified, since the nested invocations do not use the rustup proxy anymore, but use the exact executable instead, see rust-lang/rustup#3036. To solve this issue, we now build `rustup run TOOLCHAIN cargo` commands, instead of `cargo +TOOLCHAIN`, skipping the proxies entirely.
On Windows, rustup has an issue with recursive cargo invocations. This commit can be removed once rust-lang/rustup#3036 is resolved.
On Windows, rustup has an issue with recursive cargo invocations. This commit can be removed once rust-lang/rustup#3036 is resolved.
On Windows, rustup has an issue with recursive cargo invocations. This commit can be removed once rust-lang/rustup#3036 is resolved.
Problem
This is a regression in rustup 1.25 on Windows. If a program run via
cargo run
tries to run a command likecargo +nightly ...
, it fails even ifRUSTC
is unset in the environment.Splitting this off from #3031 (comment) because #3031 (comment) indicates it's a separate problem.
Steps
https://github.com/nicholasbishop/rustup-nested-bug-repro#rustup-nested-bug-repro contains a repro of this bug.
Here's the
main.rs
of that repo:On Linux this command succeeds:
On Windows it fails:
But it succeeds if the
PATH
is modified to remove toolchain entriesadded by rustup:
Possible Solution(s)
No response
Notes
No response
Rustup version
Installed toolchains
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: