Introduce +TOOLCHAIN
syntax for proxies.
#615
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
If the first argument to a proxy is of the form
+TOOLCHAIN
, then thiswill be interpreted as the toolchain the user wants. That is,
will be equivalent to
This is purely an ergonomic feature designed to reduce typing for people
who frequently switch toolchains (particularly for testing). It is
inspired by a similar feature in the Python launcher.
Why
+TOOLCHAIN
?The obvious candidate (used by Python) of
-TOOLCHAIN
was a no-go.The issue is that because toolchains can have arbitrary names, it is
difficult to distinguish between a toolchain and an actual argument to
the proxied program in the general case.
@TOOLCHAIN
was also considered, as it reads somewhat naturally inEnglish. However, it turns out that
@
is a meta character inPowershell, which causes the next word to simply disappear from the
command line. Presumably, there is a reason for this.
+TOOLCHAIN
was tested and found to not need escaping with CMD,Powershell, bash, and fish.