-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 51
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
tests: misc coverage for calendar.rs, der.rs #71
Conversation
Ah! I keep forgetting |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #71 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 95.08% 95.34% +0.25%
==========================================
Files 13 13
Lines 2604 2684 +80
==========================================
+ Hits 2476 2559 +83
+ Misses 128 125 -3
📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more |
I forget, why is that again? (https://twitter.com/weihanglo/status/1661680417643143169 should help, eventually.) |
There's a helper script I keep forgetting to use, ( Lines 21 to 35 in 6a388ac
Oh cool. That will be a nice feature. |
Right, I meant, I forget why we don't have those in the crate root as inner attributes like we do for other stuff. |
Ahhh, I understand. Some @djc I could open a separate PR to move back to that approach if you think it's worthwhile. It would reduce some dev. friction 👍 |
Yeah, I think that would be an improvement. I'd probably just get rid of the helper script. |
I was looking at some of the open PRs on the original
briansmith/webpki
repo and spotted two small ones adding bits of test coverage:The unit tests look good to me and more test coverage seems appealing so I've cherry-picked the original commits onto our fork and squashed each down into 1 commit per area of coverage (and fixed a couple
clippy
errs).Thanks @st3fan for the original implementation! :-)