Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Change]: Review of Supporting Capabilities page #287

Open
jawsgrant opened this issue Oct 6, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

[Change]: Review of Supporting Capabilities page #287

jawsgrant opened this issue Oct 6, 2023 · 0 comments
Labels
proposed change A proposed change to the specification

Comments

@jawsgrant
Copy link

Summary

Suggestions/comments on supporting capabilities page

Source

Personal contribution

Detail

4 Supporting Capabilities

Like Data Management this pillar does not use the Capabilities->Components structure

4.1 Business continuity plan

4.1.2
No guidance

4.2 Project and programme management

Query, what is the distinction between project and study?

4.4 Financial management

4.4.5: 'Could' it be useful to work with proposed projects before they are approved and funded, to ensure that they are requesting sufficient funding for the project?
Statement: You could work with 'Project Teams' at the proposal stage to understand the requirements for their project and ensure they are applying for sufficent funding to meet its needs?
Guidance: Estimating digital research costs is not easy as actual use will evolve during the project. However you should be able to estimate demand with researchers and infer likely costs of provision of digital infrastructure and TRE Operator/TRE Developer support for the project. Where possible you could work with institutional finance and research services to identify proposals at an early stage.

4.9. Legal services

Two descriptions and near repetition. This capability has components. Should components follow the model around business/application rather than Roles?

Where

https://satre-specification.readthedocs.io/en/latest/pillars/supporting.html

Proposal

4.9.1
Statement: suggested removing 'have'
You should have identify areas where legal advice may be required and ensure that you have ready access to it.

Who can help

No response

@jawsgrant jawsgrant added the proposed change A proposed change to the specification label Oct 6, 2023
jawsgrant pushed a commit to jawsgrant/satre-specification that referenced this issue Oct 11, 2023
manics added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 11, 2023
Updates support and data management #285, #287
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
proposed change A proposed change to the specification
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant