Process SATRE feature questionnaire

[edwardchalstrey1]

The SATRE feature questionnaire has been completed by ~100 participants and we need to decide how we will use this data to inform the SATRE specification doc design

Tasks

• Decide processes by Thursday 18th May:
  • Decide on collaboration method for processing SATRE feature questionnaire
  • Split the survey into sections that could be worked on independently (see here)
    • Questionnaire summary: Decide how to handle multiple choice Qs #11
    • Questionnaire summary: Decide process for handling free text (answers from a definable set) #12
    • Questionnaire summary: Decide process to handle free text (answers from a non-definable set) #16
  • Decide on process of how survey results get incorporated into specification doc #13
• Complete summary of results for each section by later date:
  • Questionnaire summary: About you, institution #14
  • Questionnaire summary: Results from multiple choice questions #17
    • Depending on how much work is identified by Questionnaire summary: Decide how to handle multiple choice Qs #11 - this may need to be split into a new issue for each Q, or one person could do all of them
  • Questionnaire summary: Results from free text (answers from a definable set) #18
  • Questionnaire summary: Results from free text (answers from a non-definable set)  #19

Related tasks

• Work on a Glossary of terms for TRE components, features and jargon satre-specification#72
• Public release of underlying survey data & analysis #20

Extra notes

• [name=Jim] Being transparent about how the survey has influenced us and our decision process is important. Would be comfortable with us rejecting a popular item if we can justify it and we are open about that.
• [name=James G] For example, some 'essential' features may not be possible depending on TRE architecture, might be out-of-scope for SATRE etc.
• [name=Chris] Agreed. We make decisions, that is our role. Influenced by the community but also guided by our knowledge and expertise. We can overrule a decision, we need to make sure we are clear why.
• [name=Chris] Therefore, use the collaboration cafe to try and fill some of the gaps and address things the survey hasn't. That we we are prepared for version 0.0.1 of the spec.

[edwardchalstrey1]

Collaboration method for processing the survey data

See https://github.com/sa-tre/feature_survey/tree/main

[edwardchalstrey1]

@JimMadge @craddm @harisood If you want to make a start helping out, I suggest the following:

1. Select 1 or more of the tasks identified above, convert to an issue and assign yourself
2. See the comment above on how to to load the survey results in Jupyter - perhaps the first person to try this can check out the final-results branch and merge this PR since Simon is away

I assigned #13 to Hari, but others can contribute there too

[edwardchalstrey1]

For collaboration cafe Thursday 18th May '23

• @harisood + @edwardchalstrey1
  • Complete Questionnaire summary: Decide how to handle multiple choice Qs #11
  • Progress as much as possible Questionnaire summary: Results from multiple choice questions #17
• @craddm @JimMadge
  • Complete Questionnaire summary: Decide process for handling free text (answers from a definable set) #12
  • Progress as much as possible Questionnaire summary: Results from free text (answers from a definable set) #18