Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

358 Bugfix Broker::processMessageReply #360

Conversation

strokyl
Copy link
Contributor

@strokyl strokyl commented Dec 21, 2016

Before this commit processMessageReply did not work for exceptions with
a reccurent id in an other timezone than the dtstart of the master event.

Before this commit processMessageReply did not work for exceptions with
a reccurent id in an other timezone than the dtstart of the master event.
@strokyl strokyl force-pushed the 358_bugfix_exception_process_message_reply branch from b523a00 to bb65fce Compare December 21, 2016 09:16
Copy link
Contributor

@gharlan gharlan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks good to me.

Copy link
Member

@staabm staabm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I can't say someting useful on this area of the codebase.
since the change is covered by a test, I would be fine with merging it into the master branch though. I would not immediately backport it, until it was used in the wild on the latest version for now.

wdyt @phil-davis ?

@staabm
Copy link
Member

staabm commented May 2, 2024

@strokyl could you rebase?

@strokyl
Copy link
Contributor Author

strokyl commented May 2, 2024

@strokyl could you rebase?

Lol, this PR is 8 year old. I am not working on sabre anymore at all. I don't remember the how/why of this PR at all and don't have the sabre base code on my laptop now!
Feel free to duplicate my PR to rebase it yourself if you need it.

@staabm
Copy link
Member

staabm commented May 2, 2024

@gharlan could you create a rebased version?

@phil-davis
Copy link
Contributor

phil-davis commented May 8, 2024

@gharlan is there a new up-to-date PR somewhere?

I made PR #651

@gharlan
Copy link
Contributor

gharlan commented May 8, 2024

I made PR #651

I made one, too: #652
It fixes also replies to existing exception events.

@phil-davis
Copy link
Contributor

And I see that @gharlan has made PR #652 - I will look at that.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants