New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
declare_union yields wrong results #30263
Comments
comment:2
Sage development has entered the release candidate phase for 9.3. Setting a new milestone for this ticket based on a cursory review. |
comment:3
Unions of several subsets also appear in another form - as open covers (which are merely lists of subsets and not manifold subsets in their own right). One might ask whether this could be unified as well. |
Dependencies: #31680 |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
comment:5
An issue with the existing code is that through a sequence of In terms of the poset of subsets that is defined by the This could be solved by introducing equivalence classes of subsets - for example by keeping the |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Last 10 new commits:
|
Author: Matthias Koeppe |
Commit: |
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
Changed branch from u/mkoeppe/declare_union_yields_wrong_results to none |
Changed commit from |
Changed author from Matthias Koeppe to none |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Commit: |
Last 10 new commits:
|
Author: Matthias Koeppe |
(for the visualization of the posets, use #31680 and install the
dot2tex
package - without that package, the layout is quite misleading)#31764 adds support for arbitrary unions. But the main issue here is the failing associativity of the union.
We fix it as follows.
When creating a union, we update the open covers of the supersets of the members, replacing the union members by the union.
Depends on #31764
CC: @egourgoulhon @tscrim
Component: manifolds
Keywords: sets, union
Author: Matthias Koeppe
Branch/Commit: u/mkoeppe/declare_union_yields_wrong_results @
743f114
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/30263
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: