Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

creating subgraph does not delete _pos entries #3055

Closed
jasongrout opened this issue Apr 29, 2008 · 6 comments
Closed

creating subgraph does not delete _pos entries #3055

jasongrout opened this issue Apr 29, 2008 · 6 comments

Comments

@jasongrout
Copy link
Member

This means that later, a call to relabel fails. This affects, for example, the graph isomorphism code (which was how the error was originally found).

Component: graph theory

Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/3055

@jasongrout
Copy link
Member Author

comment:1

Attachment: trac-3055-subgraph-del-pos.patch.gz

With #3054 and #3055 applied, doctests pass in the graphs/ directory.

@rlmill
Copy link
Mannequin

rlmill mannequin commented Apr 29, 2008

comment:2

Have not run doctests, but I support this fix.

@rlmill rlmill mannequin changed the title creating subgraph does not delete _pos entries [positive review pending tests] creating subgraph does not delete _pos entries Apr 29, 2008
@sagetrac-mabshoff
Copy link
Mannequin

sagetrac-mabshoff mannequin commented Apr 30, 2008

comment:3

#3054 and #3055 applied to my current merge tree doctest clean. So I am considering this a positive review.

Cheers,

Michael

@sagetrac-mabshoff sagetrac-mabshoff mannequin changed the title [positive review pending tests] creating subgraph does not delete _pos entries creating subgraph does not delete _pos entries Apr 30, 2008
@sagetrac-mabshoff
Copy link
Mannequin

sagetrac-mabshoff mannequin commented Apr 30, 2008

comment:4

Merged in Sage 3.0.1.alpha1

@sagetrac-mabshoff sagetrac-mabshoff mannequin closed this as completed Apr 30, 2008
@jasongrout
Copy link
Member Author

comment:5

Tracy McKay and Laura DeLoss should also get credit for exposing this bug.

@sagetrac-mabshoff
Copy link
Mannequin

sagetrac-mabshoff mannequin commented May 3, 2008

comment:6

Replying to @jasongrout:

Tracy McKay and Laura DeLoss should also get credit for exposing this bug.

Well, did they fix the bug? So far we only give credit for doing that. People who find bugs are not credited and while we could add a "reported by FOO" byline I am not sure those people will get added to the credit list.

Cheers,

Michael

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant