Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Modularization fixes for imports of number fields #35283

Merged
merged 22 commits into from
Apr 1, 2023

Conversation

mkoeppe
Copy link
Member

@mkoeppe mkoeppe commented Mar 14, 2023

📚 Description

Using the ABC sage.rings.number_field.number_field_base.NumberField

Deprecating is_NumberField.

Part of:

📝 Checklist

  • I have made sure that the title is self-explanatory and the description concisely explains the PR.
  • I have linked an issue or discussion.
  • I have created tests covering the changes.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.

⌛ Dependencies

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Mar 15, 2023

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 100.00% and project coverage change: -0.01 ⚠️

Comparison is base (c00e6c2) 88.62% compared to head (063fcf6) 88.61%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop   #35283      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    88.62%   88.61%   -0.01%     
===========================================
  Files         2148     2148              
  Lines       398855   398860       +5     
===========================================
- Hits        353480   353445      -35     
- Misses       45375    45415      +40     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/sage/algebras/quatalg/quaternion_algebra.py 92.69% <100.00%> (ø)
src/sage/categories/number_fields.py 97.43% <100.00%> (ø)
src/sage/categories/pushout.py 89.49% <100.00%> (ø)
src/sage/modular/dirichlet.py 94.02% <100.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
src/sage/modular/modsym/space.py 91.65% <100.00%> (ø)
src/sage/rings/number_field/number_field.py 93.59% <100.00%> (ø)
src/sage/rings/number_field/number_field_rel.py 91.56% <100.00%> (ø)
src/sage/rings/padics/padic_valuation.py 92.48% <100.00%> (ø)
.../sage/rings/polynomial/multi_polynomial_element.py 91.12% <100.00%> (+0.06%) ⬆️
.../sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_quotient_ring.py 91.12% <100.00%> (ø)
... and 10 more

... and 24 files with indirect coverage changes

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@mkoeppe
Copy link
Member Author

mkoeppe commented Mar 15, 2023

Thanks for reviewing!

@github-actions
Copy link

Documentation preview for this PR is ready! 🎉
Built with commit: 063fcf6

@mkoeppe
Copy link
Member Author

mkoeppe commented Mar 20, 2023

Thanks!

@vbraun
Copy link
Member

vbraun commented Mar 26, 2023

Merge conflict

SageMath version 10.0.beta6, Release Date: 2023-03-26
@vbraun
Copy link
Member

vbraun commented Mar 27, 2023

wait for the next beta

@mkoeppe
Copy link
Member Author

mkoeppe commented Mar 30, 2023

Merged #35277 to resolve the merge conflict

@vbraun vbraun merged commit 11eed27 into sagemath:develop Apr 1, 2023
@mkoeppe mkoeppe added this to the sage-10.0 milestone Apr 1, 2023
vbraun pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 23, 2023
    
<!-- Please provide a concise, informative and self-explanatory title.
-->
<!-- Don't put issue numbers in the title. Put it in the Description
below. -->
<!-- For example, instead of "Fixes #12345", use "Add a new method to
multiply two integers" -->

### 📚 Description
Splitting out the implementations that depend on libraries NTL, PARI,
Givaro to separate libraries.

Marking doctests `# optional`.

<!-- Describe your changes here in detail. -->

This is part of:
- #29705

<!-- Why is this change required? What problem does it solve? -->
<!-- If this PR resolves an open issue, please link to it here. For
example "Fixes #12345". -->
<!-- If your change requires a documentation PR, please link it
appropriately. -->

### 📝 Checklist

<!-- Put an `x` in all the boxes that apply. It should be `[x]` not `[x
]`. -->

- [x] The title is concise, informative, and self-explanatory.
- [x] The description explains in detail what this PR is about.
- [x] I have linked a relevant issue or discussion.
- [ ] I have created tests covering the changes.
- [ ] I have updated the documentation accordingly.

### ⌛ Dependencies

<!-- List all open PRs that this PR logically depends on
- #12345: short description why this is a dependency
- #34567: ...
-->
- Depends on #35283
<!-- If you're unsure about any of these, don't hesitate to ask. We're
here to help! -->
    
URL: #35389
Reported by: Matthias Köppe
Reviewer(s): Kwankyu Lee
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants