lsix

Like "ls", but for images. Shows thumbnails in terminal using sixel graphics.

Usage

lsix [ FILES ... ]

Examples

Basic Usage

Just typing lsix will show images in the current working directory. You can also specify filenames and, of course, use shell wild cards (e.g., lsix *jpg *png).

Because lsix uses ImageMagick pretty much any image format will be supported. However, some may be slow to render (like PDF), so lsix doesn't show them unless you ask specifically. If you want to force a listing of certain type of image simply specify the filenames or use a wildcard (*.pdf in the example below),.

Expanding GIFs

If you specify a GIF (or actually any file that has multiple images in it) on the command line, all the frames will get expanded and shown in a montage. For example, lsix nyancat.gif shows all the frames. Note that GIF stores some frames as only the pixels that differ from the previous frame.

Terminal background color is detected

You may have noticed that PNGs and SVG files have correct alpha channel for the terminal background. That is because lsix uses terminal escape sequences to try to figure out your foreground and background colors. (Foreground is used for the text fill color.)

In the first example below, after running lsix in a white on black xterm, I sent an escape sequence to swap foreground and background colors. When I ran it again, lsix detected it and changed the background color to white. Of course, you can pick whatever default colors you want (e.g., xterm -bg blue, in the second example below).

Features

• Works great over ssh. Perfect for manipulating those images on the web server when you can't quite remember what each one was.

• Non-bitmap graphics often work fine (.svg, .eps, .pdf, .xcf).

• Automatically detects if your terminal, like xterm, can increase the number of color registers to improve the image quality and does so.

• Automatically detects terminal's foreground and background colors.

• In terminals that support dtterm WindowOps, the number of tiles per row will be adjust appropriately to the window width.

• If there are many images in a directory (>21), lsix will display them one row at a time so you don't need to wait for the entire montage to be created.

Installation

Just put the lsix file in your path (e.g., /usr/local/bin) and run it. It's just a BASH shell script.

The only prerequisite software is ImageMagick. If you don't have it yet, your OS's package manager will make it easy to get. (E.g., apt-get install imagemagick).

Your Terminal must support Sixel graphics

I developed this on an xterm in vt340 emulation mode, but I believe this should work on pretty much any Sixel compatible terminal. Xterm does not have Sixel mode enabled by default, so you need to either run it like so:

xterm -ti vt340

Or, make vt340 the default terminal type for xterm. Add the following to your .Xresources file and run xrdb -merge .Xresources.

! Allow sixel graphics. (Try: "convert -colors 16 foo.jpg sixel:-").
xterm*decTerminalID	:	vt340

Detecting screen size requires xterm configuration

If you are using xterm, to have lsix automatically adjust how many tiles it shows based on your window size, you'll need to add the following to your .Xresources:

! Allow lsix to read the terminal window size (op #14)
xterm*allowWindowOps      : False
xterm*disallowedWindowOps : 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,11,13,18,19,20,21,GetSelection,SetSelection,SetWinLines,SetXprop

Xterm's configuration for this is rather recondite. In order to allow the operation checking the window size (#14), we have to tell xterm to not to allow window ops, but then we explicitly list the ops disallowed, and it just happens that that list does not include the number 14. (This is very silly.)

BUGS

• Directories specified on the command line should perhaps be processed as if the user had cd'd to that directory.

• ImageMagick's montage -label command doesn't handle long filenames nicely. Perhaps there's a way to wrap text?

• If you run lsix foo.avi, you're asking for trouble.

Future Issues

• The Sixel standard, at least as implemented by xterm, doesn't appear to have a way to query the size of the graphics screen. Reading the VT340 documentation, it appears your program has to already know the resolution of the device you're rendering on.

  There is a way to read the window size using the dtterm WindowOps extension but it is not quite the right solution and it is not enabled by default in xterm. The geometry of the Sixel graphics screen is not necessarily the same as the window size. (For example, xterm limits the graphics geometry to 1000x1000, even though the window can actually be larger.)

  For now, if your terminal can handle it, lsix will use the dtterm WindowOps to read your window size, but the chances of that working are slim. For most people lsix will assume you are on a VT340 (800x480) and can fit only 6 tiles per row. (I've e-mailed a proposed extension to the protocol to Thomas E. Dickey, maintainer of xterm.)

• The Sixel standard also lacks a way to query the number of color registers available. I used the extensions from xterm to do so, but I do not know how widely implemented they are. If a terminal does not respond, lsix presumes you're on an original vt340 and uses only 16 color registers. (Sorry, 4-gray vt330 users! Time to upgrade. ;-) )

• libsixel is an excellent project for writing programs that can output optimized Sixel graphics commands. Because I have a lot of respect for the project, I feel I should explain why lsix does not use libsixel.

  • (a) I wanted lsix to work everywhere easily. Bash and imagemagick are ubiquitous, so a shell script is a natural solution.

  • (b) I wanted lsix to be simple enough that it could be easily customized and extended by other people. (Including myself.)

  • (c) ImageMagick has better support for reading different formats than stb_image (the library used by libsixel's img2sixel). (For example: xpm, svg, 16-bit png, and even sixel files are not recognized by img2sixel). Since ImageMagick can read all of those and write sixel output directly, it made sense to use it for both.

  • (d) While libsixel is optimized and would surely be faster than ImageMagick, it's overkill. For a simple directory listing, this is plenty fast enough.