-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 889
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Revisit local dev setup with Docker #157
Comments
Related saleor/saleor#10104 |
Related saleor/saleor#9764 |
Related #154 |
Related #30 |
To give you some context, here is my experience with
"If this is the way to run Saleor locally, then I should be able to develop and deploy it" - I thought. However, the first words in the README of
Given that The part that says "it is for local development" could use some clarification as well. If you wanted to host your own version of Saleor, you would have to fork it. So that means the purpose of |
I have updated local subrepos to the newest releases, everything works pretty well. We will think with @magul if we should just update this repo (and continue updating), or we should also version it. Some ideas are also
|
@lkostrowski Can we consider this one closed? |
Looks like it 🚀 |
The current saleor-platform setup seems not to work correctly.
We expect a 1-command setup of the container with Saleor core and it's dependencies.
The main target as discussed with @mirekm is a seamless setup for frontenders, who want to encapsulate Python, DB, and another core-related tooling inside containers.
One solution is to maintain a set of Dockerfiles with each tool (Dashboard, Checkout, Core...) and one or more docker-compose configs to run entire ecosystem
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: