Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: Upgrade dependencies #1713

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 11, 2020
Merged

chore: Upgrade dependencies #1713

merged 2 commits into from
Feb 11, 2020

Conversation

pmdartus
Copy link
Member

Details

Upgrade all the non-Babel dependencies in the repository.

Does this PR introduce breaking changes?

  • No, it does not introduce breaking changes.

If yes, please describe the impact and migration path for existing applications.

The PR fulfills these requirements:

  • Have tests for the proposed changes been added? ✅
  • Have you followed these instructions to clearly describe the issue being fixed or feature enhanced? ✅

GUS Work Item

W-7109631

@pmdartus pmdartus changed the title chore: upgrade dependencies chore: Upgrade dependencies Feb 10, 2020
@@ -21,21 +21,22 @@ function isRelativeImport(id: string) {
return id.startsWith('.');
}

function isImplicitCssImport(id: string, importee: string) {
function isImplicitCssImport(source: string, importer: string | undefined) {
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Align with rollup parameter naming.

path.extname(importee) === '.html' &&
path.basename(id, '.css') === path.basename(importee, '.html')
path.extname(source) === '.css' &&
importer &&
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixing an actual compiler issue exhibited by the new rollup types.

Copy link
Contributor

@diervo diervo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Im a big scared of upgrading terser but...

@pmdartus
Copy link
Member Author

@diervo Yes, but the longer we wait the harder it will be to integrate the upstream changes.

@pmdartus pmdartus merged commit af72b9a into master Feb 11, 2020
@pmdartus pmdartus deleted the pmdartus/upgrade-deps branch February 11, 2020 07:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants