Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

FPORT: Consider signatures of methods before and after erasure in ExtractAPI #54

Conversation

Duhemm
Copy link
Contributor

@Duhemm Duhemm commented Jan 19, 2016

Forward port of sbt/sbt#2261.

(Supersedes #51, thanks @dwijnand!)

@Duhemm
Copy link
Contributor Author

Duhemm commented Jan 20, 2016

This makes no sense. Removing hello and hoping that the problem came from Travis.

@dwijnand
Copy link
Member

👍 Travis passed.

Duhemm added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 21, 2016
It depends on improved support for value classes in the incremental
compiler (see sbt/sbt#2261 and #54).
@Duhemm
Copy link
Contributor Author

Duhemm commented Jan 21, 2016

Note: We need to re-enable scripted test source-dependencies/value-class after this PR gets merged.

eed3si9n added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 21, 2016
…before-and-after-erasure-in-extractapi

FPORT: Consider signatures of methods before and after erasure in ExtractAPI
@eed3si9n eed3si9n merged commit e7aee52 into 1.0 Jan 21, 2016
@eed3si9n eed3si9n deleted the fport/consider-signatures-of-methods-before-and-after-erasure-in-extractapi branch January 21, 2016 14:14
@eed3si9n
Copy link
Member

Merged

Duhemm added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 21, 2016
It depends on improved support for value classes in the incremental
compiler (see sbt/sbt#2261 and #54).
@Duhemm Duhemm mentioned this pull request Jan 25, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants