IllegalAccessException with extending java class + self type annotation

[scabug]

Requires Swing:

class TestProtectedInheritance extends AbstractListModel {
  thisModel =>
  val fn = () => {
    fireContentsChanged(TestProtectedInheritance.this, 0, 0)
  }
  fn()
  def getElementAt(index: Int) = null
  def getSize = 0
}
new TestProtectedInheritance

Generates:
java.lang.IllegalAccessError: tried to access method javax.swing.AbstractListModel.fireContentsChanged(Ljava/lang/Object;II)V from class ru.smarty.TestProtectedInheritance$$$$anonfun$$2

If I comment out self type declaration everything goes well:

class TestProtectedInheritance extends AbstractListModel {
//  thisModel =>
  val fn = () => {
    fireContentsChanged(TestProtectedInheritance.this, 0, 0)
  }
  fn()
  def getElementAt(index: Int) = null
  def getSize = 0
}

No exception.

Disassembler shows generation of proxy method
public void protected$$fireContentsChanged(TestProtectedInheritance paramTestProtectedInheritance, Object paramObject, int paramInt1, int paramInt2)
{
paramTestProtectedInheritance.fireContentsChanged(paramObject, paramInt1, paramInt2);
}
In second code while in first example code is made directly. No compile time error is given.

=== Additional information ===
Might be caused by #2296.

=== What versions of the following are you using? ===

• Scala: 2.8.1
• Java: jdk1.6.0_21
• Operating system: Windows 7

[scabug]

Imported From: https://issues.scala-lang.org/browse/SI-4119?orig=1
Reporter: Yuri Malinov (yurimalinov)

[scabug]

@paulp said:
Fascinating, since the self-type a) does not specify any type and b) is never referenced, yet it is sufficient to cause miscompilation.

I think the test in superaccessors should be more like

-      def isSelfType = (host.thisSym != host) && {
+      def isSelfType = !(host.tpe <:< host.typeOfThis) && {

Not tested though.

[scabug]

@paulp said:
(In r23862) Modified the self-type protected accessor test to avoid unnecessary
runtime failures. Closes #4119, review by dragos.