Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: Add general citation from ATLAS HL-LHC Computing CDR #2101

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 23, 2023

Conversation

matthewfeickert
Copy link
Member

@matthewfeickert matthewfeickert commented Jan 23, 2023

Description

Add general citation from 'ATLAS HL-LHC Computing Conceptual Design Report' (2020).

The paradigm of Deep Learning is evolving into a more general notion of numeric programs that are end-to-end optimizable through the use of auto-differentiation techniques. Here, projects such as pyhf[49] use ML libraries not for standard neural network training but rather to compute traditional HEP targets such as profile likelihoods leading to significantly higher performances for (e.g.) maximum likelihood fitting or limit calculation. Such differentiable analysis modules will also allow more direct integration of systematic uncertainties into the ML training, leading to more robust classifiers that are well-aligned with the final science objective.

Checklist Before Requesting Reviewer

  • Tests are passing
  • "WIP" removed from the title of the pull request
  • Selected an Assignee for the PR to be responsible for the log summary

Before Merging

For the PR Assignees:

  • Summarize commit messages into a comprehensive review of the PR
* Add general citation from 'ATLAS HL-LHC Computing Conceptual Design Report'.
   - c.f. https://inspirehep.net/literature/1845103
   - CDS: https://cds.cern.ch/record/2729668

@matthewfeickert matthewfeickert added the docs Documentation related label Jan 23, 2023
@matthewfeickert matthewfeickert self-assigned this Jan 23, 2023
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 23, 2023

Codecov Report

Base: 98.30% // Head: 98.30% // No change to project coverage 👍

Coverage data is based on head (ef36dd0) compared to base (efbf201).
Patch has no changes to coverable lines.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2101   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   98.30%   98.30%           
=======================================
  Files          69       69           
  Lines        4531     4531           
  Branches      645      645           
=======================================
  Hits         4454     4454           
  Misses         45       45           
  Partials       32       32           
Flag Coverage Δ
contrib 97.88% <ø> (ø)
doctest 61.15% <ø> (ø)
unittests-3.10 96.31% <ø> (ø)
unittests-3.8 96.33% <ø> (ø)
unittests-3.9 96.35% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@matthewfeickert
Copy link
Member Author

@matthewfeickert
Copy link
Member Author

I'm going to approve and merge this myself. As always, PRs approved by a single core dev can be reverted as needed by the rest of the dev team.

@matthewfeickert matthewfeickert merged commit a794ea4 into main Jan 23, 2023
@matthewfeickert matthewfeickert deleted the docs/add-atlas-hl-lhc-CDR-cite branch January 23, 2023 08:05
matthewfeickert added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 6, 2023
* Backport:
   - PR #2040
   - PR #2063
   - PR #2066
   - PR #2082
   - PR #2083
   - PR #2089
   - PR #2092
   - PR #2094
   - PR #2101
   - PR #2107
   - PR #2116
   - PR #2120
   - PR #2126
   - PR #2127
   - PR #2153
   - PR #2160
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
docs Documentation related
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant