Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implement rudimentary support for the relational pseudo-class :has() #96

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

Gallaecio
Copy link
Member

Fixes a part of #66.

It adds very limited argument support, specifically only that which we already support for :not(). Future changes should extend argument support for both :has() and :not().

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 25, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #96 into master will increase coverage by 0.43%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master      #96      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   95.49%   95.92%   +0.43%     
==========================================
  Files           2        2              
  Lines         754      786      +32     
  Branches      128      134       +6     
==========================================
+ Hits          720      754      +34     
+ Misses         19       18       -1     
+ Partials       15       14       -1
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
cssselect/xpath.py 95% <100%> (+0.1%) ⬆️
cssselect/parser.py 96.5% <100%> (+0.63%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 518e3e1...21426b5. Read the comment docs.

@wRAR
Copy link
Member

wRAR commented Oct 25, 2022

AFAICS this was included in #115 (though I see that some tests were not included).

@Gallaecio Gallaecio closed this Jan 11, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants