Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix assertion in e2e testing ingress connectivity #1919

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 15, 2024

Conversation

zimnx
Copy link
Collaborator

@zimnx zimnx commented May 14, 2024

Eventually block without .Should(o.Succeed()) silently passes after first failed execution. This adds this missing assertion fixing the test.

Eventually block without `.Should(o.Succeed())` silently passes without execution.
This adds this missing assertion fixing the test.
@zimnx zimnx added kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. priority/important-soon Must be staffed and worked on either currently, or very soon, ideally in time for the next release. labels May 14, 2024
@scylla-operator-bot scylla-operator-bot bot added approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels May 14, 2024
@rzetelskik
Copy link
Member

Any chance this is related to #1476?

Copy link
Member

@tnozicka tnozicka left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

good catch, thx

/approve
/lgtm

@scylla-operator-bot scylla-operator-bot bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 14, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: tnozicka, zimnx

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@zimnx
Copy link
Collaborator Author

zimnx commented May 14, 2024

Any chance this is related to #1476?

I don't think so, what I'm fixing in this PR are false positives.

@zimnx
Copy link
Collaborator Author

zimnx commented May 14, 2024

2x manager flake
/retest

@zimnx
Copy link
Collaborator Author

zimnx commented May 14, 2024

And another one manager flake
/retest

@zimnx
Copy link
Collaborator Author

zimnx commented May 14, 2024

come on manager
/retest

@zimnx
Copy link
Collaborator Author

zimnx commented May 14, 2024

again
/retest

@zimnx
Copy link
Collaborator Author

zimnx commented May 15, 2024

Manager flake

/override ci/prow/e2e-gke-parallel-clusterip

Copy link
Contributor

@zimnx: Overrode contexts on behalf of zimnx: ci/prow/e2e-gke-parallel-clusterip

In response to this:

Manager flake

/override ci/prow/e2e-gke-parallel-clusterip

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@scylla-operator-bot scylla-operator-bot bot merged commit 7c18e7e into scylladb:master May 15, 2024
12 checks passed
@zimnx zimnx deleted the fix-e2e-condition branch May 15, 2024 09:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. priority/important-soon Must be staffed and worked on either currently, or very soon, ideally in time for the next release. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants