Skip to content

๐Ÿƒ "Smarter" flyd streams - run/error/catch functional handlers

License

Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings

sdougbrown/flyd-run

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

ย 

History

6 Commits
ย 
ย 
ย 
ย 
ย 
ย 
ย 
ย 
ย 
ย 
ย 
ย 
ย 
ย 
ย 
ย 
ย 
ย 
ย 
ย 
ย 
ย 

Repository files navigation

๐Ÿƒ Flyd Run

Build Status GitHub issues Dependencies

"Smarter" flyd streams - run/error/catch functional handlers

What?

This is just a wrapper around flyd's stream API that adds a couple few new properties: run, error, and catch. These are largely inspired by mithril's new m.prop.

The nice part of this particular module is that it's fully compatible with the flyd API - opening the door to powerful constructs.

Why?

Having a common API on every stream in an application allows you to do wrap other functionality and always provide the same API surface. For example, you could wrap a fetch request like so:

// vastly simplified for clarity
// note that flyd streams absorb promises
function request(url, ops = {}) {
  const req = stream();

  fetch(url, ops).then((response) => {
    if (response.ok) {
      req.error(null);
      return req(response.json());
    }
    return req.error(response.json());
  }).catch((rejection) => {
    return req.error(rejection);
  });

  return req;
}

This would allow you to fetch requests and retreive responses via the stream API...

const req = request('/api/user/1');

req.run((response) => {
  store.save('user', response);
});

req.error.run((rejection) => {
  alert(rejection.message);
});

But how is that any different from using Promises?

This technique allows you to sustitute a fetch request behind the scene for a locally cached response - just wrap the cached data with the same stream call and you get the same API - that way your view code et-all doesn't need to worry about caches etc.

A simplified example...

const cacheObj = {};

export function load({ name, locale = 'en' }) {
  const requestUrl = `${API_URL}?document=${name}&locale=${locale}`;
  const storeKey = `${name}_${locale}`;

  return get(requestUrl, storeKey);
}

function cache(name, obj) {
  if (!name) {
    throw new Error('no cache identifier provided');
  }

  if (isDefined(obj)) {
    cacheObj[name] = obj;
  }

  return cacheObj[name];
}

function get(url, key) {
  const stored = cache(key);

  if (stored) {
    return stream(stored);
  }

  const req = request(url);

  req.run((item) => {
    cache(key, item);
  });

  return req.catch(() => {
    return cache(key, null);
  });
}

That way in the view/router/wherever you might just run...

import { load } from 'store';

const dataReq = load({ name: 'post123', locale: 'zh'});

dataReq.run((post) => {
  // send to view state
});

This abstracts the caching concern away from the view and allows you to quietly refactor and improve without worrying about the view-facing API.

Also, by their very nature, streams may represent data in different states and therefore may run more than once. (Promises fire only once, by contrast). This could be very desireable in live-updating applications (e.g. websocket responses).

Wait, isn't 'Run' just 'Map'?

It's certainly similar, but does two important things:

  • Guarantees to never fire the callback when the stream is pending (undefined value).
  • Sounds cooler, and is easier to understand in the context of async requests.

About

๐Ÿƒ "Smarter" flyd streams - run/error/catch functional handlers

Resources

License

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Packages

No packages published