Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

zones with bignum seems to be imprecise for computing summaries #19

Closed
caballa opened this issue May 19, 2018 · 1 comment
Closed

zones with bignum seems to be imprecise for computing summaries #19

caballa opened this issue May 19, 2018 · 1 comment
Assignees

Comments

@caballa
Copy link
Contributor

caballa commented May 19, 2018

The tests

  • simple/test-arr-4.c
  • simple/test-arr-4.unsafe.c
  • simple/fntest-1.c
  • simple/fntest-1.unsafe.c

from crab-llvm do not pass if we use:

  typedef SDBM_impl::BigNumDefaultParams<number_t> SplitDBMGraph;
  typedef SplitDBM<number_t, varname_t, SplitDBMGraph> BASE(split_dbm_domain_t);

in include/crab_llvm/crab_domains.hh

@caballa caballa added the bug label May 19, 2018
@caballa caballa self-assigned this May 19, 2018
@caballa caballa added enhancement and removed bug labels Jul 20, 2018
caballa added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 29, 2018
Added some comments about the possibility of overflows on weight
operations with some graph configurations.
@caballa
Copy link
Contributor Author

caballa commented Aug 29, 2018

Fixed in commit 85330f0

@caballa caballa closed this as completed Aug 29, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant