Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixed RDOC dependency for 5.0.0 #79

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

ddsferreira
Copy link

This PR is to fix a dependency issue with RDoc 5.0.0.
rake newb was broken.
With this fix everything works again.

@@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ def initialize_publish
# Declare a dependency on rdoc, IF NEEDED.

def activate_publish_deps
dependency "rdoc", "~> 4.0", :developer if need_rdoc
dependency "rdoc", ">= 4.0", :developer if need_rdoc
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Author

@ddsferreira ddsferreira Feb 7, 2017

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

How would you handle this scenario then where you need to work with rdoc ~> 4.0 and rdoc ~> 5.0?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry... Um... probably >= 4.0 and < 6...

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I guess that is basically the same isn't it? When will RDOC get a major 6 version?

@zenspider zenspider self-assigned this Mar 1, 2017
@zenspider
Copy link
Member

I've made a corresponding change. Thanks.

@zenspider zenspider closed this Feb 2, 2018
@seattlerb seattlerb locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 24, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants