Simhash Near-Duplicate Detection
This library enables the identification of all fingerprints that are nearly identical to a query fingerprint. In this context, a fingerprint is an unsigned 64-bit integer.
It also comes with an auxillary function designed to generate a fingerprint
char* and a length. This fingeprint is generated with a tokenizer and
a hash function (both of which may be provided as template paramters). Using a
cyclic hash function, it then performs simhash on a moving window of tokens (as
defined by the tokenizer).
The default hash function is
jenkins hash and the default tokenizer splits on
This library links against
must be installed before building this. With that in place:
git submodule update --init --recursive cd src && make && ./test
For those curious about testing performance, you can run the benchmark. It performs a number of insertions into the query data structure, and then performs 4 queries for each of those inserted fingerprints. Provide a number as the first argument on the command line to change the number of items inserted. To be clear, this is done on merely one of the tables needed to perform simhash queries.
I'll work on this documentation as time permits, but for the time being, refer
to the source and
In this context, there is a large corpus of known fingerprints, and we would like to determine all the fingerprints that differ by our query by k or fewer bits. To accomplish this, we divide up the 64 bits into at m blocks, where m is greater than k. If hashes A and B differ by at most k bits, then at least m - k groups are the same.
Choosing all the unique combinations of m - k blocks, we perform a permutation on each of the hashes for the documents so that those blocks are first in the hash. Perhaps a picture would illustrate it better:
63------53|52------42|41-----32|31------21|20------10|09------0| | A | B | C | D | E | F | If m = 6, k = 3, we'll choose permutations: - A B C D E F - A B D C E F - A B E C D F ... - C D F A B E - C E F A B D - D E F A B C
This generates a number of tables that can be put into sorted order, and then a small range of candidates can be found in each of those tables for a query, and then each candidate in that range can be compared to our query.
The corpus is represented by the union of these tables, could conceivably be hosted on a separate machine. And each of these tables is also amenable to sharding, where each shard would comprise a contiguous range of numbers. For example, you might divide a table into 256 shards, where each shard is associated with each of the possible first bytes.
The best partitioning remains to be seen, likely from experimentation, but the
basis of this is the
table tracks hashes inserted into it
subject to a permutation associated with the table. This permutation is
described as a vector of bitmasks of contiguous bit ranges, whose populations
sum to 64.
Let's suppose that our corpus has a fingerprint:
and we have a query:
and they differ by only three bits which happen to fall in blocks B, D and E:
63------53|52------42|41-----32|31------21|20------10|09------0| | A | B | C | D | E | F | | | | | | | | 0000000000000000010000000000000000100000000000000001000000000000
Since any fingerprint matching the query differs by at most 3 bits, at most 3
blocks can differ, and at least 3 must match. Whatever table has the 3 blocks
that do not differ as the leading blocks will match the query when doing a
scan. In this case, the table that's permuted
A C F B D E will match. It's
important to note that it's possible for a query to match from more than one
table. For example, if two of the non-matching bits are in the same block, or
the query differs by fewer than 3 bits.