Proposed documentation improvements

[kasajian]

I don't want to sound like I'm looking a gift-horse in the mouth, after all entire library is being given to us for free, but I have to say that I'm disappointed in the fact that the time-space complexity of the data structures is not documented. To me, that would be the first thing someone will look at. Like, if I look at, for instance, a hashed linked lists, it would be nice if it said what the cost is for look ups, insertion, etc. That's one of the main criterion for selecting a data-structure.

[sestoft]

Is it possible you missed the documentation:
http://www.itu.dk/research/c5/latest/ITU-TR-2006-76.pdf

Peter

On 10Jun16 22:34, "Kenneth Kasajian" <notifications@github.commailto:notifications@github.com> wrote:

I don't want to sound like I'm looking a gift-horse in the mouth, after all entire library is being given to us for free, but I have to say that I'm disappointed in the fact that the time-space complexity of the data structures is not documented. To me, that would be the first thing someone will look at. Like, if I look at, for instance, a hashed linked lists, it would be nice if it said what the cost is for look ups, insertion, etc. That's one of the main criterion for selecting a data-structure.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/49, or mute the threadhttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/AAsoEDfQx1VVHTn-zzbaWkpmqtfPgd0mks5qKcpHgaJpZM4IzTbB.

[kasajian]

Yes. I did miss it, and here's why. I'm looking at the front page of the project under "Getting Started". The second item is "documentation" and it points to https://c5docs.azurewebsites.net/

That documentation is nothing like the documentation that you pointed to, the PDF.

I am not sure if the PDF file you pointed to is also linked somewhere on here -- it may be staring in my face. But to be honest, when there's a section titled "documentation" in the readme, and it points to a link.. I wouldn't think "oh, there must be different documentation somewhere else", and go looking. I assumed that link is to the only docs that are available.

It makes perfect sense now that you pointed it out to me. Thank you for your help

[sestoft]

On 11Jun16 6:27, "Kenneth Kasajian" <notifications@github.com<mailto:notifications@github.com>> wrote: Yes. I did miss it, and here's why. I'm looking at the front page of the project under "Getting Started". The second item is "documentation" and it points to https://c5docs.azurewebsites.net/ Sorry about this silliness; I've now added a reference to the PDF documentation too. Peter

[kasajian]

word

On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 11:24 PM, Peter Sestoft notifications@github.com
wrote:

On 11Jun16 6:27, "Kenneth Kasajian" <notifications@github.com<mailto:
notifications@github.com>> wrote:

Yes. I did miss it, and here's why. I'm looking at the front page of the
project under "Getting Started". The second item is "documentation" and it
points to https://c5docs.azurewebsites.net/

Sorry about this silliness; I've now added a reference to the PDF
documentation too.

Peter

—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#49 (comment), or mute
the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/ACRjnYzllwBAnoR8sBcSexWElhhY90Lnks5qL5qIgaJpZM4IzTbB
.