-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 642
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feature Request: Additional op amp paremters (slew etc.) #330
Comments
ormaaj asked: "Is the 741 sufficient as a representative op-amp model? Yeah it's often used for illustration due to its historical significance and "simple" 3-stage bipolar design." Good question. I can easily adjust the output current and slew rate. But the 741 isn't rail to rail. Another op-amp model might be better, if it's simple. The 741 is complicated enough as it is. I found an LM324 model that is actually less complicated, and it gets closer to the rails, so maybe I'll use that? |
I was thinking a slew rate and relative rail limit would be a good improvement, since it allows you to get a semi-accurate estimate of what would happen for a wide variety of op amps. So how about a "select op amp" which has several, plus a custom option which allows you to set these parameters customly, instead of using a more realistic model. That way you have an ultra realistic model for certain op amps and a more ideal one for whatever you happen to use. |
I would like to request more realistic OP amps..
Real op amps have a number of features that make the simulator less than realistic...
In real circuits, you usually need a bypass capacitor, because of the current draw from the + and - pins.
The following things would be helpful:
Option to enable + and - pins
Ability to set slew rate
Ability to set GBP
Ability to set common mode range
Ability to enable non-zero input bias current
Ability to set minimum and maximum output voltages relative to Vcc and Vee.
Ability to set maximum source and sink current on op amp output.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: