-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 547
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
tuf demo code #366
tuf demo code #366
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Asra Ali <asraa@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Asra Ali <asraa@google.com>
How do you see this working with https://docs.google.com/document/d/12BBOXMhA99J3KzNaotT1J4OTSDlNnK110_9FZkPv-A0/ I have started to put a WIP here: #407 I am wondering if I should wait for this work to complete first in case one is going to invalidate the other. |
This one came from this discussion and doc: #86 |
Gotcha, it makes sense we work together on this then. From the doc:
The above is what the other PR does (minus the timestamper), although it also fixes it to a registry |
Hey @asraa , is this still a WIP or was it moved to the sigstore-root repo?? |
This PR is stale because it has been open 30 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in 10 days. |
This PR was closed because it has been stalled for 10 days with no activity. |
This is some WIP TUF code.
The major thing I want to do is to not rely on my hand-grown store. I'd like to remove a lot of it in favor of actually using methods exposed by Repo , which I think is possible. Here were some fixes to undraftify it:
#86