Fix key fuzzer for more coverage #455
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Arthur Chan <arthur.chan@adalogics.com>
Signed-off-by: Arthur Chan <arthur.chan@adalogics.com>
vlsi
reviewed
May 25, 2023
Signed-off-by: Arthur Chan <arthur.chan@adalogics.com>
loosebazooka
approved these changes
Nov 1, 2023
Merged
|
replaced by #626 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Currently, the Keys.constructTufPublicKey method will not be called if Keys.parsePublicKey throws an exception. This PR changes the logic of KeysFuzzer by separating the two method call into two separate fuzzers.
Release Note
Documentation