Add Autozone

[adamstgr]

Issue: closes #10271

Similarweb rank: 1628

Checklist

• I updated the JSON data in _data/simple-icons.json
• I optimized the icon with SVGO or SVGOMG
• The SVG viewbox is 0 0 24 24

Description

Stacked icon reference images from the app store icon and AutoZonePro.

Recreated the stacked icon image using an svg from Autozone.com.

Hex value was determined based on the lettering for the name of the company which is consistent though it differs from the color of slashes that precedes the lettering.

[adamrusted]

Thanks @adamstgr - where did you find the specific SVG you used? The one at source has a much larger shape on the left-hand side.

[adamstgr]

@adamrusted image here. It was selected based on the discussion around the initial Autozone request.

This case didn't seem to neatly fall into the categories on the Source Guidelines for the contributing doc because it's using the images folder but trying to access autozone.com/images will redirect to autozone.com. Should I change to the change the link to be the one I've included above, directly to the image?

[adamrusted]

Should I change to the change the link to be the one I've included above, directly to the image?

Nope, the homepage is fine - I wasn't aware that one was buried in the source code!

[PeterShaggyNoble]

I'm still seeing those same differences Adam pointed out, @adamstgr, and I don't know that increasing the precision to 5 is going to fix it, although it's always worth a try. It appears that the stripes in yours have shifted up somewhere along the way - if I manually align them to the same Y coordinate as the ones in the source file then they line up perfectly.

Also, I'd still love if we could find or recreate a vector of the stacked version of the logo; it would suit our needs much better.

[adamstgr]

@PeterShaggyNoble I'll track down or recreate a vector of the stacked version of the logo

[PeterShaggyNoble]

Nice work, @adamstgr 👍🏻 Even making allowances for the poor quality of the app icon, you version is showing more differences than we would normally allow. But, after discussing it with @adamrusted, we're both agreed that as you've used elements from an officially sourced SVG to recreate it that we're OK to run with is as-is in this case.

If anyone feels different strongly enough or we ever find a better version, preferably vector, of it then we can always revisit it.