Add Pexels

[PeterShaggyNoble]

Issue: Closes #2156

Checklist

• I updated the JSON data in _data/simple-icons.json
• I optimized the icon with SVGO or SVGOMG
• The SVG viewbox is 0 0 24 24

Description

Icon & colour from logo in website header. Possible alternative, based on this SVG:

[foo-dogsquared]

I've seen no problem with this PR so I approve both versions.
Though, we just have to agree on what version to push through the repo.

I'm leaning more on the first version since I see the logo more with the bounding box (like this recent event page for example).

What do the other maintainers think (@simple-icons/maintainers).

[PeterShaggyNoble]

I also haven't seen them using the unboxed version anywhere so I'd say it's safe to disregard it. Even moreso because I've since noticed that it was generated by Potrace and, the more icons I see that are made with it, the more I'm becoming of the opinion that we shouldn't accept them as an official source.

It seems to me like there's something out there that's automatically running raster favicon files through Potrace and adding the link tag to the HTML of sites without anyone first reviewing them. While some of them turn out fine, most seem to be inconsistent with the branding or of very low quality or both.

[ericcornelissen]

It seems to me that indeed the boxed version is the way to go 👍

While some of them turn out fine, most seem to be inconsistent with the branding or of very low quality or both.

It is probably okay that they're low quality because they're always displayed at a small size (namely as a pinned tab in the Safari browser, guessing from the file name). To be fair to Potrace, the standard raster-to-vector algorithms in Illustrator etc. have the same issue. I do agree that we should not use these SVGs as an official sources as the quality is usually too low.