ixy - a userspace network driver in 1000 lines of code

ixy is a simple userspace packet processing framework. It takes exclusive control of a network adapter and implements the whole driver in userspace. Its architecture is similar to DPDK and Snabb and completely different from (seemingly similar) frameworks such as netmap, pfq, pf_ring, or XDP (all of which rely on kernel components). In fact, reading both DPDK and Snabb drivers was crucial to understand some parts of the Intel 82599 datasheet better.

Check out the draft of our paper or watch the recording of our talk at 34C3 to learn more.

ixy is designed for educational purposes to learn how a network card works at the driver level. Lack of kernel code and external libraries allows you to look through the whole code from startup to the lowest level of the driver. Low-level functions like handling DMA descriptors are rarely more than a single function call away from your application logic.

A whole ixy app, including the whole driver, is only ~1000 lines of C code. Check out the ixy-fwd and ixy-pktgen example apps and look through the code. The code often references sections in the Intel 82599 datasheet or the VirtIO specification, so keep them open while reading the code. You will be surprised how simple a full driver for a network card can be.

Features

• Driver for Intel NICs in the ixgbe family, i.e., the 82599ES family (aka Intel X520)
• Driver for paravirtualized virtio NICs
• Less than 1000 lines of C code for a packet forwarder including the whole driver
• No kernel modules needed
• Simple API with memory management, similar to DPDK, easier to use than APIs based on a ring interface (e.g., netmap)
• Support for multiple device queues and multiple threads
• Super fast, can forward > 25 million packets per second on a single 3.0 GHz CPU core
• Super simple to use: no dependencies, no annoying drivers to load, bind, or manage - see step-by-step tutorial below
• BSD license

Supported hardware

Tested on an Intel 82599ES (aka Intel X520), X540, and X550. Might not work on all variants of these NICs because our link setup code is a little bit dodgy.

How does it work?

Check out the draft of our paper.

If you prefer to dive into the code: Start by reading the apps in src/app then follow the function calls into the driver. The comments in the code refer to the Intel 82599 datasheet (Revision 3.3, March 2016).

Compiling ixy and running the examples

Caution

Your NIC has full DMA access to your memory. A misconfigured NIC will cause memory corruptions that might crash your server or even destroy your filesystem. Do not run this on any systems that have anything remotely important on them if you want to modify the driver. Our version is also not necessarily safe and might be buggy. You have been warned.

Running ixy will unbind the driver of the given PCIe device without checking if it is in use. This means the NIC will disappear from the system. Do not run this on NICs that you need. We currently have a simple check if the device is actually a NIC, but trying to use another device could crash your system.

1. Install the following dependencies

   • gcc >= 4.8
   • make
   • cmake

   Run this on Debian/Ubuntu to install them:

   sudo apt-get install -y build-essential cmake
   

2. Configure 2MB hugepages in /mnt/huge using our script:

   cd ixy
   sudo ./setup-hugetlbfs.sh
   

3. Run cmake and make

   cmake .
   make
   

4. That's it! You can now run the included examples, e.g.:

   sudo ./ixy-pktgen 0000:XX:YY.Z
   

   Replace the PCI address as needed. All examples expect fully qualified PCIe bus addresses, i.e., typically prefixed with 0000:, as arguments. You can use lspci from the pciutils (Debian/Ubuntu) package to find the bus address. For example, lspci shows my 82599ES NIC as

   03:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82599ES 10-Gigabit SFI/SFP+ Network Connection (rev 01)

   which means that I have to pass 0000:03:00.0 as parameter to use it.

Wish list

It's not the plan to implement every single feature, but a few more things would be nice to have. The list is in no particular order.

Implement at least one other driver beside ixgbe

To showcase how to make the framework more independent from the used hardware. Virtual NICs like VirtIO are a good candidate to build a simple VM-based environment.

NICs that rely too much on firmware (e.g., Intel XL710) are not fun, because you end up only talking to a firmware that does everything. The same is true for NICs like the ones by Mellanox that keep a lot of magic in kernel modules, even when being used by frameworks like DPDK.

NUMA support

PCIe devices are attached to a specific CPU in NUMA systems. DMA memory should be pinned to the correct NUMA node. Threads handling packet reception should also be pinned to the same NUMA node.

RSS support

What's the point of having multiple rx queues if there is no good way to distribute the traffic to them? Shouldn't be too hard. See Section 7.1.2.8 in the datasheet.

tcpdump-like example

A simple rx-only app that writes packets to a .pcap file based on mmap and fallocate. Most of the code can be re-used from libmoon's pcap.lua.

Multi-threaded mempools

A mempool can currently only be accessed by a single thread, i.e., a packet must be allocated and free'd by the same thread. This prevents apps that implement different processing steps on different cores, a common multi-threading model for complex chains.

The current limitation is the list of free buffers in the mempool, it's a simple stack at the moment. Replacing this with a lock-free stack or queue makes it safe for use with multiple threads.

The good news is that multi-threaded mempools are essentially the same problem as passing packets between threads: both can be implemented with the same queue/ring buffer data structure.

FAQ

Why C and not a more reasonable language?

It's the lowest common denominator that everyone should be able to understand -- this is for educational purposes only. I've taken care to keep the code simple and understandable.

I can't get line rate :(

We are currently facing a weird problem that impacts performance if your CPU is too fast. DPDK had the same problem in the past. Try applying bidirectional traffic to the forwarder and/or underclock your CPU to speed up ixy.

It's more than ~1000 lines! There is a huge ixgbe_type.h file.

ixgbe_type.h is copied from the Intel driver, it's only used as a machine-readable version of the datasheet. ixy only uses #define definitions for registers and the two relatively simple structs for the DMA descriptors. Overall, ixy uses less than 100 lines of the file and we could remove the remainder.

But it's nice to have all the struct definitions right there when implementing a new driver feature. Copy & pasting magic values from the datasheet is significantly less fun. Another interesting approach to making these values available is writing a parser for the tables in the datasheet. Snabb does this.

Should I use this for my production app?

No.

When should I use this?

To understand how a NIC works and to understand how a framework like DPDK or Snabb works.