Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

riofs vs s3fs performance ? #76

Open
sunxm opened this issue Oct 27, 2014 · 2 comments
Open

riofs vs s3fs performance ? #76

sunxm opened this issue Oct 27, 2014 · 2 comments

Comments

@sunxm
Copy link

sunxm commented Oct 27, 2014

anybody have compare the performance between riofs and s3fs ?

@Archenoth
Copy link

In my experience, riofs is much faster than s3fs, but s3fs supports fstab.
I was pointed here by this answer on Server Fault because s3fs was really slow for me.

It looks like issue #6 may be a duplicate of this, but I don't really want to post this there because that isn't my own benchmark.

@journeytosilius
Copy link

It is faster but not superfast. And it supports symlinks but for some
reason I can't figure out how to compile it with support to synlinking.

2014-10-27 22:49 GMT+01:00 Matthew MacLean notifications@github.com:

riofs is faster than s3fs, but s3fs supports fstab.

I was pointed here by this question
http://serverfault.com/questions/396100/s3fs-performance-improvements-or-alternative
on Server Fault because s3fs was really slow for me.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#76 (comment).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants