-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Check in PyTorchModel #79
Check in PyTorchModel #79
Conversation
also includes fixes to docstrings
pytorch model accepting inputs with multiple samples
|
||
|
||
def test_model_from_yaml( | ||
rootdir: str, california_model_kwargs: Dict[str, Union[List, Dict, str]] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@ChristopherMayes are we ok with the file overhead of testing on the California dataset?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
its certainly aiding in creating a robust testing suite
modifications to PyTorchModel to enable this use
additional CustomMean class and reorganisation of test files
A summary of what I've found out relating to the conda-build stage:
|
Implementation of a PyTorchModel class. Currently allows loading model via python objects or from yaml, although loading from yaml requires assigning transformation objects after object creation