fastrand

Fast pseudorandom number generator.

Features

• Optimized for speed.
• Performance scales on multiple CPUs.

How does it work?

It abuses sync.Pool for maintaining "per-CPU" pseudorandom number generators.

TODO: firgure out how to use real per-CPU pseudorandom number generators.

Benchmark results

$ GOMAXPROCS=1 go test -bench=. github.com/valyala/fastrand
goos: linux
goarch: amd64
pkg: github.com/valyala/fastrand
BenchmarkUint32n                   	50000000	        29.7 ns/op
BenchmarkRNGUint32n                	200000000	         6.50 ns/op
BenchmarkRNGUint32nWithLock        	100000000	        21.5 ns/op
BenchmarkMathRandInt31n            	50000000	        31.8 ns/op
BenchmarkMathRandRNGInt31n         	100000000	        17.9 ns/op
BenchmarkMathRandRNGInt31nWithLock 	50000000	        30.2 ns/op
PASS
ok  	github.com/valyala/fastrand	10.634s

$ GOMAXPROCS=2 go test -bench=. github.com/valyala/fastrand
goos: linux
goarch: amd64
pkg: github.com/valyala/fastrand
BenchmarkUint32n-2                     	100000000	        17.6 ns/op
BenchmarkRNGUint32n-2                  	500000000	         3.36 ns/op
BenchmarkRNGUint32nWithLock-2          	50000000	        32.0 ns/op
BenchmarkMathRandInt31n-2              	20000000	        51.2 ns/op
BenchmarkMathRandRNGInt31n-2           	100000000	        11.0 ns/op
BenchmarkMathRandRNGInt31nWithLock-2   	20000000	        91.0 ns/op
PASS
ok  	github.com/valyala/fastrand	9.543s

$ GOMAXPROCS=4 go test -bench=. github.com/valyala/fastrand
goos: linux
goarch: amd64
pkg: github.com/valyala/fastrand
BenchmarkUint32n-4                     	100000000	        14.2 ns/op
BenchmarkRNGUint32n-4                  	500000000	         3.30 ns/op
BenchmarkRNGUint32nWithLock-4          	20000000	        88.7 ns/op
BenchmarkMathRandInt31n-4              	10000000	       145 ns/op
BenchmarkMathRandRNGInt31n-4           	200000000	         8.35 ns/op
BenchmarkMathRandRNGInt31nWithLock-4   	20000000	       102 ns/op
PASS
ok  	github.com/valyala/fastrand	11.534s

As you can see, fastrand.Uint32n scales on multiple CPUs, while rand.Int31n doesn't scale. Their performance is comparable on GOMAXPROCS=1, but fastrand.Uint32n runs 3x faster than rand.Int31n on GOMAXPROCS=2 and 10x faster than rand.Int31n on GOMAXPROCS=4.