Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: enforce correct type for security-severity in sarif output #5091

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 5, 2024

Conversation

thisislawatts
Copy link
Member

@thisislawatts thisislawatts commented Mar 5, 2024

Pull Request Submission

Please check the boxes once done.

The pull request must:

  • Reviewer Documentation
    • follow CONTRIBUTING rules
    • be accompanied by a detailed description of the changes
    • contain a risk assessment of the change (Low | Medium | High) with regards to breaking existing functionality. A change e.g. of an underlying language plugin can completely break the functionality for that language, but appearing as only a version change in the dependencies.
    • highlight breaking API if applicable
    • contain a link to the automatic tests that cover the updated functionality.
    • contain testing instructions in case that the reviewer wants to manual verify as well, to add to the manual testing done by the author.
    • link to the link to the PR for the User-facing documentation
  • User facing Documentation
    • update any relevant documentation in gitbook by submitting a gitbook PR, and including the PR link here
    • ensure that the message of the final single commit is descriptive and prefixed with either feat: or fix: , others might be used in rare occasions as well, if there is no need to document the changes in the release notes. The changes or fixes should be described in detail in the commit message for the changelog & release notes.
  • Testing
    • Changes, removals and additions to functionality must be covered by acceptance / integration tests or smoke tests - either already existing ones, or new ones, created by the author of the PR.

Pull Request Review

All pull requests must undergo a thorough review process before being merged.
The review process of the code PR should include code review, testing, and any necessary feedback or revisions.
Pull request reviews of functionality developed in other teams only review the given documentation and test reports.

Manual testing will not be performed by the reviewing team, and is the responsibility of the author of the PR.

For Node projects: It’s important to make sure changes in package.json are also affecting package-lock.json correctly.

If a dependency is not necessary, don’t add it.

When adding a new package as a dependency, make sure that the change is absolutely necessary. We would like to refrain from adding new dependencies when possible.
Documentation PRs in gitbook are reviewed by Snyk's content team. They will also advise on the best phrasing and structuring if needed.

Pull Request Approval

Once a pull request has been reviewed and all necessary revisions have been made, it is approved for merging into
the main codebase. The merging of the code PR is performed by the code owners, the merging of the documentation PR
by our content writers.

What does this PR do?

Addresses defect in recently shipped security-severity property.

properties.security-severity
(Recommended only for security rules) If you include a value for this field, results for the rule are treated as security results. A string representing a score that indicates the level of severity, between 0.0 and 10.0, for security queries (@tags includes security). This, with the properties.precision property, determines whether the results are displayed by default on GitHub so that the results with the highest security-severity, and highest precision are shown first. Code scanning translates numerical scores as follows: over 9.0 is critical, 7.0 to 8.9 is high, 4.0 to 6.9 is medium and 3.9 or less is low.
Reference: https://docs.github.com/en/code-security/code-scanning/integrating-with-code-scanning/sarif-support-for-code-scanning#reportingdescriptor-object

Thanks to @pgrabowski for reporting this ✨
#5014 (comment)

@thisislawatts thisislawatts force-pushed the fix/correct-typing-for-security-severity branch from 97517b6 to 67bd82c Compare March 5, 2024 11:22
@thisislawatts thisislawatts force-pushed the fix/correct-typing-for-security-severity branch from 67bd82c to c6af1e9 Compare March 5, 2024 11:40
@thisislawatts thisislawatts marked this pull request as ready for review March 5, 2024 11:43
@thisislawatts thisislawatts requested a review from a team as a code owner March 5, 2024 11:43
@thisislawatts thisislawatts enabled auto-merge (squash) March 5, 2024 11:46
@thisislawatts thisislawatts merged commit f0c8339 into main Mar 5, 2024
14 checks passed
@thisislawatts thisislawatts deleted the fix/correct-typing-for-security-severity branch March 5, 2024 12:34
@@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ export function getTool(testResult): sarif.Tool {
testResult.packageManager!,
],
cvssv3_baseScore: vuln.cvssScore, // AWS
'security-severity': vuln.cvssScore, // GitHub
'security-severity': String(vuln.cvssScore), // GitHub
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I believe if vuln.cvssScore is null, this pushes "undefined" to the property bag.

I would suggest adding a null testcase and verifying.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can confirm. Github Code Scanning is now rejecting sarif files from Snyk CLI.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
4 participants