collection not found error when requiring racket-cas

[spdegabrielle]

Welcome to DrRacket, version 6.4.0.8--2016-02-18(db04b47/a) [3m].
Language: racket; memory limit: 1024 MB.

(require racket-cas/repl)
. standard-module-name-resolver: collection not found
for module path: racket-cas/repl
collection: "racket-cas"
in collection directories:
/Users/spdegabrielle/Library/Racket/snapshot/collects
/Applications/Racket v6.4.0.8/collects
... [164 additional linked and package directories] in: racket-cas/repl
no packages suggestions are available .

[spdegabrielle]

Updating to see if this resolves.

---

Update database to match the configured set of catalogs?

The currently configured catalogs are:
https://www.cs.utah.edu/plt/snapshots/20160218-db04b47/catalog/
https://pkgs.racket-lang.org
https://planet-compats.racket-lang.org

The database-recorded catalogs are:

[spdegabrielle]

Update package list did not resolve.
Checking the package manager tab 'available from catalog' tab I've used the filter with 'some' to identify your packages: racket-poppler is present but racket-cas is not.
I'll admit I haven't familiarised myself with how the (now not so new) package management works, so please forgive me if I have made a mistake.

[soegaard]

Hi Stephen,

I don't think racket-cas is on the new pkgs.racket-lang.org yet.
Just clone the github repository directly.
Open racket-cas/racket-cas/racket-cas.rkt run it.
Evaluate (require (submod "." start)) in the repl
to make ' do automatic simplification.

/Jens Axel

2016-02-21 20:55 GMT+01:00 Stephen De Gabrielle notifications@github.com:

Update package list did not resolve.
Checking the package manager tab 'available from catalog' tab I've used
the filter with 'some' to identify your packages: racket-poppler is present
but racket-cas is not.
I'll admit I haven't familiarised myself with how the (now not so new)
package management works, so please forgive me if I have made a mistake.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#3 (comment).

Jens Axel Søgaard

[spdegabrielle]

thanks - that resolves it.
i've proposed a small change to readme