Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix/editorial review #45

Closed
wants to merge 0 commits into from
Closed

Fix/editorial review #45

wants to merge 0 commits into from

Conversation

matthieubosquet
Copy link
Member

This pull request suggests editorial changes that correspond to a set of conventions for turtle documents:

  • Define prefixes using the SPARQL compatible syntax. See also: Turtle 1.1 Spec IRIs Note. I believe the RDF 1.1 Turtle parsers should be considered widely deployed.
  • Section comments: Prefixes, Ontology, Classes and Properties.
  • Alphabetical ordering within sections.
  • Defined prefferred ontology prefix and URI using vann.
  • Link the ontology to the specification(s) using rdfs:seeAlso.
  • Link everything that the ontology defines, including itself to the ontology using rdfs:isDefinedBy.
  • Use of dc:issued and dc:modified to reflect the evolution of the ontology.

@TallTed
Copy link
Contributor

TallTed commented Dec 17, 2020

Replaced by #46

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants