Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Compatibility for NOAA and IRIDL data sets #309

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Nov 13, 2018
Merged

Compatibility for NOAA and IRIDL data sets #309

merged 4 commits into from
Nov 13, 2018

Conversation

jdossgollin
Copy link
Contributor

Closes #293 and #299.
This PR makes two changes which make aospy compatible with a greater range of data sets, specifically including those from the IRI Data Library and NOAA data sets such as the NCEP-NCAR Reanalysis. This compatibility is expanded through (1) the addition of several new names for GRID_ATTRS as discussed in #293 (for X, Y, P, and #299 (for nbnds); land was not discussed in a previous issue but is also a relevant use case without likelihood of confusion, and (2) a modification of ensure_time_avg_has_cf_metadata to avoid the assumption that BOUNDS_STR is a coordinate of time_weights as discussed in #299.

Copy link
Collaborator

@spencerkclark spencerkclark left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks really good @jdossgollin; I just have one minor suggestion regarding the formatting of the what's new entry.

docs/whats-new.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@spencerahill
Copy link
Owner

Thanks much @jdossgollin ! Congrats on your first aospy PR, and sorry again for those aspects of the procedure that we accidentally made pretty confusing.

@spencerahill spencerahill merged commit 3924310 into spencerahill:develop Nov 13, 2018
@jdossgollin jdossgollin deleted the noaa-iridl-compat branch November 13, 2018 15:30
@jdossgollin
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks for the patience and guidance @spencerahill and @spencerkclark !

@spencerahill
Copy link
Owner

spencerahill commented Nov 13, 2018

No problem at all. Looking forward to additional future contributions from you :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants