m2r haven't been updated in years #123
Comments
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
Using |
|
In miyakogi/m2r#60 (comment) |
m2r is unmaintained [0]. It relies on mistune, but is not compatible with mistune versions >= 2.0 [1]. This makes it impossible to update mistune, even though there is a CVE in the package [2]. Switch to sphinx-mdinclude instead. There is also m2r2, but it is not a suitable alternative because they simply force the use of an older mistune version. [0] sphinx-contrib#123 [1] miyakogi/m2r#66 [2] GHSA-fw3v-x4f2-v673 [3] CrossNox/m2r2#43
m2r is unmaintained [0]. It relies on mistune, but is not compatible with mistune versions >= 2.0 [1]. This makes it impossible to update mistune, even though there is a CVE in the old versions of the package [2]. Switch to sphinx-mdinclude instead. There is also m2r2, but it is not a suitable alternative because they simply force the use of an older mistune version [3]. [0] sphinx-contrib#123 [1] miyakogi/m2r#66 [2] GHSA-fw3v-x4f2-v673 [3] CrossNox/m2r2#43
Sphinxcontrib-openapi relies on m2r. But m2r is unmaintained [0]. It relies on mistune, but is not compatible with mistune versions >= 2.0 [1]. This makes it impossible to update mistune, even though there is a CVE in the old versions of the package [2]. Switch to sphinx-mdinclude instead. There is also m2r2, but it is not a suitable alternative because they simply force the use of an older mistune version [3]. [0] sphinx-contrib/openapi#123 [1] miyakogi/m2r#66 [2] GHSA-fw3v-x4f2-v673 [3] CrossNox/m2r2#43 Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com>
Sphinxcontrib-openapi relies on m2r. But m2r is unmaintained [0]. It relies on mistune, but is not compatible with mistune versions >= 2.0 [1]. This makes it impossible to update mistune, even though there is a CVE in the old versions of the package [2]. Switch to sphinx-mdinclude instead. There is also m2r2, but it is not a suitable alternative because they simply force the use of an older mistune version [3]. [0] sphinx-contrib/openapi#123 [1] miyakogi/m2r#66 [2] GHSA-fw3v-x4f2-v673 [3] CrossNox/m2r2#43 Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com>
[ upstream commit 4f893e8 ] Sphinxcontrib-openapi relies on m2r. But m2r is unmaintained [0]. It relies on mistune, but is not compatible with mistune versions >= 2.0 [1]. This makes it impossible to update mistune, even though there is a CVE in the old versions of the package [2]. Switch to sphinx-mdinclude instead. There is also m2r2, but it is not a suitable alternative because they simply force the use of an older mistune version [3]. [0] sphinx-contrib/openapi#123 [1] miyakogi/m2r#66 [2] GHSA-fw3v-x4f2-v673 [3] CrossNox/m2r2#43 Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com> Signed-off-by: Tobias Klauser <tobias@cilium.io>
[ upstream commit 4f893e8 ] Sphinxcontrib-openapi relies on m2r. But m2r is unmaintained [0]. It relies on mistune, but is not compatible with mistune versions >= 2.0 [1]. This makes it impossible to update mistune, even though there is a CVE in the old versions of the package [2]. Switch to sphinx-mdinclude instead. There is also m2r2, but it is not a suitable alternative because they simply force the use of an older mistune version [3]. [0] sphinx-contrib/openapi#123 [1] miyakogi/m2r#66 [2] GHSA-fw3v-x4f2-v673 [3] CrossNox/m2r2#43 Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com> Signed-off-by: Tobias Klauser <tobias@cilium.io>
|
@qmonnet just saw that you fixed the issue in a branch of your fork. Any chance you would be willing to maintain that fork any further? would be highly appreciated to have a solution publicly available that does not rely on pinning the mistune version |
Sorry, I don't have the expertise of the time for that (the changes I contributed are pretty minor). But I was planning to submit the changes as a PR to the current repository. It was pending some other fix which was addressed last week, now I just need to find a moment to get to it and create the PR. |
m2r is unmaintained [0]. It relies on mistune, but is not compatible with mistune versions >= 2.0 [1]. This makes it impossible to update mistune, even though there is a CVE in the old versions of the package [2]. Switch to sphinx-mdinclude instead. There is also m2r2, but it is not a suitable alternative because they simply force the use of an older mistune version [3]. [0] sphinx-contrib#123 [1] miyakogi/m2r#66 [2] GHSA-fw3v-x4f2-v673 [3] CrossNox/m2r2#43 Fixes: sphinx-contrib#123
m2r is unmaintained [0]. It relies on mistune, but is not compatible with mistune versions >= 2.0 [1]. This makes it impossible to update mistune, even though there is a CVE in the old versions of the package [2]. Switch to sphinx-mdinclude instead. There is also m2r2, but it is not a suitable alternative because they simply force the use of an older mistune version [3]. [0] sphinx-contrib#123 [1] miyakogi/m2r#66 [2] GHSA-fw3v-x4f2-v673 [3] CrossNox/m2r2#43 Fixes: sphinx-contrib#123
sad to hear, but understandable. Let's see if something happens to your PR as this repo seems to be untouched for two years... |
m2r is unmaintained [0]. It relies on mistune, but is not compatible with mistune versions >= 2.0 [1]. This makes it impossible to update mistune, even though there is a CVE in the old versions of the package [2]. Switch to sphinx-mdinclude instead. There is also m2r2, but it is not a suitable alternative because they simply force the use of an older mistune version [3]. [0] sphinx-contrib#123 [1] miyakogi/m2r#66 [2] GHSA-fw3v-x4f2-v673 [3] CrossNox/m2r2#43 Fixes: sphinx-contrib#123
|
@jeriox Just for your information, the PR has been merged, and a new tag was created a few days ago, in case this issue is still relevant to you. |
|
@qmonnet already got the notification that this issue has been closed, was happy to see it. Thanks for the PR and the ping! |
With the recent major release Mistune (2.0), leading to breakage (see miyakogi/m2r#66), I suggest to switch to m2r2: https://github.com/CrossNox/m2r2
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: