Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(titus/pipeline): use proper git ssh URL for docker bakes #7480

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 2, 2019

Conversation

erikmunson
Copy link
Member

Most Titus users at Netflix use the option to pull git repository information from the pipeline trigger, which uses expressions to build up a git URL which is passed to our internal bakery.

Turns out that when not using that option and specifying a branch/hash/etc. yourself in the stage, we weren't putting the appropriate query string ? before the hash component of the URL.

Copy link
Contributor

@christopherthielen christopherthielen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I suppose this works, but why don't we have to specify a query param name, such as ?hash=${stage.repository.hash}

@erikmunson
Copy link
Member Author

i don't make the rules, i just follow them 🤷‍♂

@erikmunson erikmunson merged commit c6c69a3 into spinnaker:master Oct 2, 2019
@erikmunson erikmunson deleted the fix-docker-bake-url branch October 2, 2019 22:39
christopherthielen added a commit to christopherthielen/deck that referenced this pull request Oct 7, 2019
c6c69a3 fix(titus/pipeline): use proper git ssh URL for docker bakes (spinnaker#7480)
christopherthielen added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 7, 2019
c6c69a3 fix(titus/pipeline): use proper git ssh URL for docker bakes (#7480)
yunzhangit pushed a commit to yunzhangit/deck that referenced this pull request Mar 28, 2021
yunzhangit pushed a commit to yunzhangit/deck that referenced this pull request Mar 28, 2021
c6c69a3 fix(titus/pipeline): use proper git ssh URL for docker bakes (spinnaker#7480)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants