Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(rosco): Re-evaluate roscoSelector on stage updates #7577

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 29, 2019

Conversation

alanmquach
Copy link
Contributor

Minor fix, roscoMode only got evaluated once, but if roscoSelector is used, we should really evaluate every time the stage is updated so that changes that cause the result to flip between true and false appropriately flip roscoMode and the bake stage config is updated appropriately (rosco fields toggled).

Copy link
Contributor

@jeyrschabu jeyrschabu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good call!

@alanmquach alanmquach merged commit d620e05 into spinnaker:master Oct 29, 2019
@alanmquach alanmquach deleted the fix-updates branch October 29, 2019 00:18
alanmquach added a commit to alanmquach/deck that referenced this pull request Oct 29, 2019
d620e05 fix(rosco): Re-evaluate roscoSelector on stage updates (spinnaker#7577)
dae00c8 feat(rosco): Allow optional roscoDetailUrl for roscoMode bakes (spinnaker#7575)
Jammy-Louie pushed a commit to pivotal/deck that referenced this pull request Nov 8, 2019
d620e05 fix(rosco): Re-evaluate roscoSelector on stage updates (spinnaker#7577)
dae00c8 feat(rosco): Allow optional roscoDetailUrl for roscoMode bakes (spinnaker#7575)
yunzhangit pushed a commit to yunzhangit/deck that referenced this pull request Mar 28, 2021
yunzhangit pushed a commit to yunzhangit/deck that referenced this pull request Mar 28, 2021
d620e05 fix(rosco): Re-evaluate roscoSelector on stage updates (spinnaker#7577)
dae00c8 feat(rosco): Allow optional roscoDetailUrl for roscoMode bakes (spinnaker#7575)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants