-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 55
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fixed 'transport_name' option resolver check in QueueInteropTransport #82
Conversation
It should work without those additional declared |
If you check symfony/framework-bundle@5205108, 'transport_name' will be added automatically each time from 4.3.3, therefore I updated tests reflecting reality agree on the new test, maybe a bit overkill just to show that it does not fail without 'transport_name' provided :) |
On second thought yes, you're right, Symfony will be adding it so it should be checked that it properly "works" when passed 😋 |
@sroze Any idea when you are able to merge it? I am desperately waiting for the fix :) |
@chq81 You can use composer's ability to overwrite package repositories to use your own fork with patch applied until this one is merged. https://getcomposer.org/doc/05-repositories.md#loading-a-package-from-a-vcs-repository
So, in your case it might be: {
"repositories": [
{
"type": "vcs",
"url": "https://github.com/chq81/messenger-enqueue-transport"
}
],
"require": {
"sroze/messenger-enqueue-transport": "^0.3.2 | dev->>BRANCH-NAME<<"
}
} Adding |
I'm also interested in getting this fixed 👍 Currently this prevents us from updating to Symfony 4.3.3 in https://github.com/shopware/platform |
@Steveb-p Thank you very much for the detailed instructions. |
yeah, on our side we froze to 4.3.2 for symfony/framework-bundle waiting for this to be merged |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've tested this on a project.
Thank you
Thank you @ekkinox! |
Fixed 'transport_name' option resolving.
See related issue: #81