Skip to content

fix: Fixed various issues in the CRD structure#429

Merged
sbernauer merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
fix-crd
Dec 5, 2023
Merged

fix: Fixed various issues in the CRD structure#429
sbernauer merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
fix-crd

Conversation

@sbernauer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Description

Part of stackabletech/issues#469

Definition of Done Checklist

  • Not all of these items are applicable to all PRs, the author should update this template to only leave the boxes in that are relevant
  • Please make sure all these things are done and tick the boxes
# Author
- [ ] Changes are OpenShift compatible
- [ ] CRD changes approved
- [ ] Helm chart can be installed and deployed operator works
- [ ] Integration tests passed (for non trivial changes)
- [ ] Changes need to be "offline" compatible
# Reviewer
- [ ] Code contains useful comments
- [ ] (Integration-)Test cases added
- [ ] Documentation added or updated
- [ ] Changelog updated
- [ ] Cargo.toml only contains references to git tags (not specific commits or branches)
# Acceptance
- [ ] Feature Tracker has been updated
- [ ] Proper release label has been added

@sbernauer sbernauer self-assigned this Dec 5, 2023
@sbernauer sbernauer requested a review from fhennig December 5, 2023 08:25
@sbernauer sbernauer enabled auto-merge December 5, 2023 08:29
@maltesander maltesander self-requested a review December 5, 2023 14:40

@maltesander maltesander left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@sbernauer sbernauer added this pull request to the merge queue Dec 5, 2023
Merged via the queue into main with commit dbf9cfa Dec 5, 2023
@sbernauer sbernauer deleted the fix-crd branch December 5, 2023 14:43
@lfrancke

lfrancke commented Dec 8, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Is this a CRD change? Breaking?

@maltesander

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Its breaking in terms of removing a bad default (empty string) which would not have worked anyways if left out since the pods would not be able to read from / mount a secret with an empty name...
@sbernauer and i decided this is basically non breaking in terms of functionality and crd adaptation (since leaving it out would not work) and skip this in the arch meeting.

@sbernauer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Agreed!

@lfrancke

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I probably need to ask better questions.
What I'm wondering is if people will need to change their custom resources as a result of this.

@maltesander

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

If you did not specify the optional value and used the bad default, the deployed pods will never start.
So i would assume everyone that is using it has a value set here.

@lfrancke lfrancke added the release-note/action-required Denotes a PR that introduces potentially breaking changes that require user action. label Sep 9, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

release-note/action-required Denotes a PR that introduces potentially breaking changes that require user action. type/bug

Projects

Archived in project

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants