Minimal fix for spawning periodic notification process #3
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The current comparision between an int and a dict always returns false so the periodic notification process never spawns. This minimal fix should get it working again. A later patch could support user defined periods. Change-Id: If0649a1fe6a5337a20f0aba9a1a4ea8a0dd04617
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The current comparision between an int and a dict always returns
false so the periodic notification process never spawns. This minimal
fix should get it working again. A later patch could support user
defined periods.
Change-Id: If0649a1fe6a5337a20f0aba9a1a4ea8a0dd04617