Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

User facing FFMPEG configuration #10

Closed
StashAppDev opened this issue Feb 11, 2019 · 3 comments
Closed

User facing FFMPEG configuration #10

StashAppDev opened this issue Feb 11, 2019 · 3 comments
Labels
feature Pull requests that add a new feature

Comments

@StashAppDev
Copy link
Member

stashapp/StashServer#41

@StashAppDev StashAppDev changed the title [Feature] User facing FFMPEG configuration User facing FFMPEG configuration Mar 24, 2019
@StashAppDev StashAppDev added the feature Pull requests that add a new feature label Mar 24, 2019
@WithoutPants
Copy link
Collaborator

stash currently generates various images and videos with the following settings:
Screenshots:

  • time location: (0.2 * duration)
  • quality: 2
  • width: video width
  • output format: jpg
  • exposed via /screenshot

Thumbnails:

  • time location: (0.2 * duration)
  • quality: 5
  • width: 320
  • output format: jpg

Note: thumbnails are currently not used by anything

Preview videos:

  • video chunks: 12
  • width: 640
  • chunk duration: 0.75s
  • output format: mp4 (x264/aac)
  • exposed via /preview

Preview video webp:

  • width: 640
  • fps: 12
  • output format: webp
  • exposed via /webp

Scene marker videos:

  • width: 640
  • duration: 20s
  • output format: mp4 (x264/aac)
  • exposed via /stream

Scene marker images:

  • width: 640
  • duration 5s
  • output format: webp
  • exposed via /preview

Transcode videos:

  • width: original width
  • output format: mp4 (x264/aac)

Streaming transcodes

  • width: original width
  • output format: webm

@WithoutPants
Copy link
Collaborator

With #178 sorting out the transcode sizes, do we think there's anything else needed for this issue, or can it be closed?

@Leopere
Copy link
Collaborator

Leopere commented Feb 13, 2020

This was requested to be addressed on November 17th 2019 I'll close this pending any further commentary.

@Leopere Leopere closed this as completed Feb 13, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature Pull requests that add a new feature
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants