Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

use MIT license #394

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 22, 2019
Merged

use MIT license #394

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 22, 2019

Conversation

pacman82
Copy link

This fixes #393 and #390.

From the short discussion we had it seemed to me that a single MIT License is the best fit. I also put the LICENSE file in each crate subdirectory, which is published to crates.io. Metadata has been updated accordingly.

Thank you four your quick reaction, and keep up your awesome work!

Copy link
Owner

@stepancheg stepancheg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A question: do we need LICENSE.txt in every directory? This is because these files are packed into Cargo package?

protoc-rust/Cargo.toml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@stepancheg stepancheg merged commit f2e9b25 into stepancheg:master Feb 22, 2019
@stepancheg
Copy link
Owner

Cherry-picked this diff to the stable branch (v2.3).

Please let me know if this change needs to be released earlier than the next planned release.

@pacman82
Copy link
Author

Thanks, the next planned release is fine, with me.

martinvonz added a commit to martinvonz/rust-protobuf that referenced this pull request Oct 5, 2022
It seems that this was decided in stepancheg#394, but then it has just been
forgotten in crates added after that PR.
martinvonz added a commit to martinvonz/rust-protobuf that referenced this pull request Oct 5, 2022
It seems that this was decided in stepancheg#394, but then it has just been
forgotten in crates added after that PR.
martinvonz added a commit to martinvonz/rust-protobuf that referenced this pull request Oct 5, 2022
It seems that this was decided in stepancheg#394, but then it has just been
forgotten in crates added after that PR.
stepancheg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 25, 2024
It seems that this was decided in #394, but then it has just been
forgotten in crates added after that PR.
stepancheg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 25, 2024
It seems that this was decided in #394, but then it has just been
forgotten in crates added after that PR.
vaikzs pushed a commit to vaikzs/rust-protobuf that referenced this pull request Jun 1, 2024
It seems that this was decided in stepancheg#394, but then it has just been
forgotten in crates added after that PR.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

MIT or BSD-2 license?
2 participants