You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
@mengyin for general likelihoods does it make sense to have the "null-biased" prior as
default? Might be better to make it uniform? What is your experience?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Yes I always use the "uniform" prior instead of the "null-biased" prior. It makes more sense to make the default prior "uniform".
But "null-biased prior" might still be useful in some contexts? Say when we compare singlecell data of two replicates and try finding "outlying genes", we estimate p:=count1/(count1+count2), the mode should be around 0.5 and we expect most genes to come from the "null component" (mode pointmass component).
@mengyin for general likelihoods does it make sense to have the "null-biased" prior as
default? Might be better to make it uniform? What is your experience?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: