Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature Request: Caching #48

Closed
itainoam opened this issue Apr 2, 2017 · 2 comments
Closed

Feature Request: Caching #48

itainoam opened this issue Apr 2, 2017 · 2 comments
Assignees

Comments

@itainoam
Copy link

itainoam commented Apr 2, 2017

It would be nice to have background caching. First time takes a few seconds to load.

@itainoam itainoam changed the title Feature Request Feature Request: Caching Apr 2, 2017
@steyep
Copy link
Owner

steyep commented Apr 2, 2017

When the user launches the workflow (when jira is typed into Alfred), a background process is initiated to start retrieving new data and updating out-dated data (see Issue #6). So, in short, the workflow is caching information. Since this is designed to be an Alfred workflow as opposed to a stand-alone app, I didn't want to add any processes (background or otherwise) that aren't initiated by the workflow being launched.

That said, the same script that runs the background processes when the workflow is launched could be daemonized and set to run on a time interval pretty easily. I suppose I could implement it that way so that the user can choose whether to run the script in the background. Does that sound sufficient?

@steyep steyep self-assigned this Apr 2, 2017
@steyep steyep marked this as a duplicate of #63 Jul 19, 2017
steyep added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 24, 2017
steyep added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 24, 2017
Minor tweaks to background processes/logging
Issue #48
@steyep
Copy link
Owner

steyep commented Jul 24, 2017

This feature was added in v1.0.5

@steyep steyep closed this as completed Jul 24, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants