Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

satellite/metainfo: Fix misspelling in comment #3636

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 24, 2019
Merged

Conversation

ifraixedes
Copy link
Member

@ifraixedes ifraixedes commented Nov 22, 2019

What: Fix a misspelling.
Why:

Please describe the tests: N/A
Please describe the performance impact: N/A

Reported by @imkharn (c2e605e#commitcomment-36073387)

Code Review Checklist (to be filled out by reviewer)

  • NEW: Are there any Satellite database migrations? Are they forwards and backwards compatible?
  • Does the PR describe what changes are being made?
  • Does the PR describe why the changes are being made?
  • Does the code follow our style guide?
  • Does the code follow our testing guide?
  • Is the PR appropriately sized? (If it could be broken into smaller PRs it should be)
  • Does the new code have enough tests? (every PR should have tests or justification otherwise. Bug-fix PRs especially)
  • Does the new code have enough documentation that answers "how do I use it?" and "what does it do?"? (both source documentation and higher level, diagrams?)
  • Does any documentation need updating?
  • Do the database access patterns make sense?

@ifraixedes ifraixedes added Request Code Review Code review requested Reviewer Can Merge If all checks have passed, non-owner can merge PR labels Nov 22, 2019
@ifraixedes ifraixedes requested a review from a team November 22, 2019 15:34
@ifraixedes ifraixedes self-assigned this Nov 22, 2019
@cla-bot cla-bot bot added the cla-signed label Nov 22, 2019
@ghost ghost requested review from cam-a and Fadila82 and removed request for a team November 22, 2019 15:34
ifraixedes referenced this pull request Nov 22, 2019
…n 4 parts (#3616)

* satellite/metainfo: Rollback path parts check in loop

We have to rollback the changes applied in checking the rawPath parts
from 4 to 3 because the production prointerDB is still storing buckets.

* satellite/metainfo: Don't return path parts less 4

Don't return an error in the metainfo loop iterator when a path doesn't
have 4 parts because it belongs to bucket metadata, not an actual
object.
@mniewrzal mniewrzal merged commit 48a557e into master Nov 24, 2019
@mniewrzal mniewrzal deleted the if/fix-typo branch November 24, 2019 21:04
bryanchriswhite added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 25, 2019
* storj/master: (63 commits)
  web/satellite:  token payments logic (#3581)
  satellite/metainfo: reduce pointerDB access for CommitObject (#3589)
  satellite/metainfo: Fix misspelling in comment (#3636)
  argon2: choose a steady parallelism value (#3630)
  satellitedb: add support to testplanet for cockroachdb (#3634)
  satellite/console/auth: return in error handle added (#3639)
  Make sed a little more cross platformable (#3629)
  web: ms edge support bug fixed (#3638)
  web/satellite: registration/welcome message fixed, usage-report url fixed, storj-sim fixed (#3622)
  web/satellite: fonts changed to Inter (#3620)
  storagenode/updater: read identity location from storagenode's config.yaml (#3607)
  cmd/segment-reaper: Implement bitmask type (#3626)
  storagenode/gracefulexit: improve logging (#3633)
  private/testplanet: add a mock referral manager server into testplanet (#3631)
  satellite/gracefulexit: refactor concurrency (#3624)
  pkg/pb/referralmanager: update to add satellite ID to Get Tokens request (#3625)
  satellite/metainfo: improve Loop comments (#3595)
  storagenode: add bandwidth metrics (#3623)
  satellite/console: Add security headers (#3615)
  satellite/payments: token deposit accept cents (#3628)
  ...
bryanchriswhite pushed a commit to bryanchriswhite/storj that referenced this pull request Oct 29, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cla-signed Request Code Review Code review requested Reviewer Can Merge If all checks have passed, non-owner can merge PR
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants