Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Test TP <-> (Proxy) JN <-> (Pool) JN #84

Closed
Tracked by #46
Fi3 opened this issue Nov 17, 2021 · 2 comments
Closed
Tracked by #46

Test TP <-> (Proxy) JN <-> (Pool) JN #84

Fi3 opened this issue Nov 17, 2021 · 2 comments
Assignees
@4ss0
Labels
job declarator sv2 pool sv2 proxy test Test related
Milestone
Milestone 3

Comments

@Fi3
Copy link
Collaborator

Fi3 commented Nov 17, 2021

No description provided.

@Fi3 Fi3 mentioned this issue Nov 17, 2021
Closed
12 tasks
@Fi3 Fi3 self-assigned this Nov 17, 2021
@Fi3 Fi3 assigned 4ss0 and unassigned Fi3 Mar 31, 2022
@rrybarczyk rrybarczyk changed the title test template provider <-> (proxy) negotiator <-> (pool) negotiator issue Test TP <-> (Proxy) Negotiator <-> (Pool) JN Sep 26, 2022
@rrybarczyk rrybarczyk changed the title Test TP <-> (Proxy) Negotiator <-> (Pool) JN Test TP <-> (Proxy) JN <-> (Pool) JN Sep 26, 2022
@rrybarczyk
Copy link
Collaborator

Check that when the Proxy JN recieves some messages, it responds with the appropriate way.
Consider:

  • Mocking the TP and the Pool JN, to properly test the Proxy JN
  • Mocking the TP and the Proxy JN, to properly test the Pool JN

@pavlenex pavlenex modified the milestones: MVP 2, Version 0.1 Apr 6, 2023
@pavlenex
Copy link
Collaborator

pavlenex commented May 5, 2023

This one was done in mvp2

@pavlenex pavlenex closed this as completed May 5, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@4ss0 4ss0

Labels
job declarator sv2 pool sv2 proxy test Test related
Projects
SV2 Roadmap 🛣️
Archived in project
Milestone
Milestone 3
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@Fi3 @4ss0 @rrybarczyk @pavlenex